Effects of five levels of noise reduction applied to indirect digital radiography on diagnostic accuracy of external apical root resorption

Sanaz Sharifi Shoshtari, Seyed Arman Mohagheghi, Nastaran Farhadi, Negin Kheradmand, Lida Naderi

Abstract


Background: Radiologic diagnosis of external apical root resorption (EARR) is clinically important.
Noise might disrupt this diagnosis. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of noise reduction on
periapical indirect digital radiography.
Materials and Methods: in vitro this study as performed on 792 radiographs. A total of 66 single‑rooted
premolars were inserted in dried hemimandibles of sheep and fixed with modeling wax. Digital
images were obtained using the parallel technique. The storage phosphor plates were processed
in the DIGORA Optime scanner. The resulting images were sent to a computer using the Scanora
software for radiographic analysis. The teeth were removed from the mandible, and artificial EARR
defects were simulated. Afterward, the indirect digital radiographs were obtained at the same
condition of the baseline. Five levels of noise reduction were applied. All images were saved in
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format and monitored by two observers twice
over 2 weeks. Data were analyzed statistically 

using Cochran and McNemar tests (α = 0.05).

Results: The highest sensitivity rate was found in the baseline group (0.99), and the lowest sensitivity
was related to the “four‑time noise reduction” method (0.91). The highest specificity rate was in
the “five‑times noise reduction” method (0.88) and the lowest specificity was associated with
“one‑time noise reduction” method (0.71). There was no statistical difference between images
with/without noise reduction enhancement with varied gradation levels in terms of diagnostic
accuracies of EARR (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: Application of noise reduction procedure in Scanora software might have no effect
on the accuracy of EARR diagnosis.


Keywords


Computer‑assisted image processing,digital imaging, root resorption

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.