Evaluation of the effect of amalgam fillings on the diagnosis of proximal caries using cone‑beam computed tomography technique

Mehrdad Abdinian, Mohadeseh Sharifi, Kioumars Tavakoli Tafti

Abstract


Background: Diagnosis of dental caries using cone‑beam computed tomography (CBCT) may be
hindered due to several introduced and inherent artifacts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the
effect of amalgam fillings on the accuracy of diagnosis of proximal caries in CBCT.
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 102 extracted human teeth (mandibular and maxillary
molars and premolars) were used. Six molars were chosen for mesio‑occluso‑distal amalgam
restorations. Before obtaining the CBCT images, the 96 remaining teeth were stabilized in dental
sockets of six dry human skulls in a way that the proximal contacts re‑established. Thereafter, six
of the molar teeth were replaced by the amalgam‑restored teeth and the second group of images
was then obtained. All images were evaluated by two independent observers in the panorama view
and the presence or absence of caries was recorded. For histopathologic investigations, the teeth
were cut and assessed by an oral pathologist using a stereomicroscope. The McNemar test was
used for comparison between CBCT assessments and histopathologic evaluations (P < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant). In addition, the receiver operating characteristics curve was
utilized to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy in different sections of imaging.
Results: The result sensitivity and specificity of CBCT imaging in the first group of images before
placement of the restored teeth were 0.96 and 0.36, respectively. In the second group of images
after placement of the restored teeth, these values were 0.78 and 0.18, respectively. Moreover,
statistical analysis showed that there is a good agreement in interproximal caries diagnosis between
histopathologic and CBCT imaging findings without placement of amalgam restorations (P < 0.001).
However, this agreement does not exist after amalgam restorations (P = 0.84).
Conclusion: Diagnosis of proximal caries using CBCT is not an efficient method where there are
amalgam restorations adjacent to the suspected teeth.
Key Words: Cone‑beam computed tomography, dental amalgam, dental caries, radiography

 

 

 

Highlight

 Mohadeseh Sharifi: Pubmed,Google Scholar


Full Text:

PDF xml

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.