Standardization of honey as a tissue fixative for histopathology: A morphometric study

B. Sabarinath, Shruthi Suresh, G. B. Protyusha, S. Dhanarathna

Abstract


Background: Tissue fixation is a crucial step to preserve the tissues in a life‑like state with minimal disruption to its cellular and chemical composition for histopathological examination. The search for an effective alternate tissue fixative to the routinely used formaldehyde has gained interest as constant exposure to formaldehyde has proven to be toxic. Honey, an organic substance with high acidity and hygroscopic nature, exhibits tissue fixative properties and has been used in the present study. The present study aimed to standardize honey as a tissue fixative for histopathology by comparing it with formalin. Materials and Methods: Oral tissue samples of goat were fixed in 10% honey and 10% formalin solution, respectively, for 24–48 h, followed by routine tissue processing and microscopic examination of 37 slides per group.2200 epithelial cells (1100 per group) were selected for the computer‑aided morphometric image analysis (Fiji‑Image J) by three observers. Cell area (CA), cell perimeter (CP), nuclear area (NA), nuclear perimeter (NP), cytoplasmic area (Cyt A), and nuclear‑cytoplasmic ratio were the parameters studied. Mann–Whitney U‑test (STATA/IC version 16) for inter‑group comparison was done and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The probability of epithelial cells in the honey‑fixed group to have greater NA, NP, and N/C ratio was about 50%–60%. The probability of epithelial cells in formalin‑fixed tissues to have greater CA, CP, and Cyt A was about 70%. Conclusion: Honey is a better nuclear fixative than formalin. Cytoplasmic shrinkage of epithelial cells should be taken into consideration while fixing tissues with honey.

Key Words: Epithelial cells, fixative, formalin, honey, tissue fixation

 

 

Highlight

 B. SabarinathPubmed,Google Scholar


Full Text:

PDF xml

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.