<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.0//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query/static/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet><Article><Journal><PublisherName>Isfahan University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName><JournalTitle>Dental Research Journal</JournalTitle><Issn>1735-3327</Issn><Volume>4</Volume><Issue>1</Issue><PubDate PubStatus="epublish"><Year>2008</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>20</Day></PubDate></Journal><ArticleTitle>The Effect of Fluid Composite as Gingival Layer on Microleakage of Class II Composite Restorations</ArticleTitle><FirstPage>48</FirstPage><LastPage>48</LastPage><AuthorList><Author><FirstName>M.</FirstName><LastName>Sadeghi</LastName><Affiliation>. mostafasadeghi@yahoo.com</Affiliation></Author></AuthorList><History><PubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2010</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>06</Day></PubDate></History><Abstract>Introduction&#13;
Fluid composites have been suggested as gingival layer beneath class II composite restorations to improve marginal integrity and reduce microleakage. This in-vitro study evaluated the influence of fluid composites as gingival layer on microleakage of class II packable, microhy-brid, and fiber-reinforced composite restorations with the margins below the cementoenamel junc-tion (CEJ).&#13;
&#13;
Methods and Materials&#13;
45 sound premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons were selected. Class II cavities were prepared on the mesial and distal aspects with the gingival margin placed 1 mm be-low the CEJ, making 90 slot cavities. Teeth were randomly assigned into 3 groups (n=15). In each group, one side of each tooth was restored incrementally with respective packable, microhybrid, and fiber-reinforced composites; whereas, on the other side, fluid composite was placed as a 1 mm thickness gingival increment before restoration with the same composites. The teeth were stored for one week in distilled water at 37ْ C, thermo-cycled (5-55ْ C, x 1500), and immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine for 24 hours. Dye penetration was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at 10x magnification. The data were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U-test.&#13;
&#13;
Results&#13;
The fluid composite reduced microleakage at gingival margins of Class II restorations (P</Abstract></Article></ArticleSet>
