DRJ Dent Res J Dental Research Journal Dental Research Journal 1735-3327 2008-0255 Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd. India DRJ-13-379 10.4103/1735-3327.192266 Review Article Scaffolds in regenerative endodontics: A review Gathani Kinjal M Raghavendra Srinidhi S Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India Address for correspondence:Srinidhi Raghavendra, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India srinidhi73@gmail.com Sep–Oct 2016 13 5 379 386 Copyright: © Dental Research Journal 2016

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Root canal therapy has enabled us to save numerous teeth over the years. The most desired outcome of endodontic treatment would be when diseased or nonvital pulp is replaced with healthy pulp tissue that would revitalize the teeth through regenerative endodontics. ′A search was conducted using the Pubmed and MEDLINE databases for articles with the criteria ′Platelet rich plasma′, ′Platelet rich fibrin′, ′Stem cells′, ′Natural and artificial scaffolds′ from 1982-2015′. Tissues are organized as three-dimensional structures, and appropriate scaffolding is necessary to provide a spatially correct position of cell location and regulate differentiation, proliferation, or metabolism of the stem cells. Extracellular matrix molecules control the differentiation of stem cells, and an appropriate scaffold might selectively bind and localize cells, contain growth factors, and undergo biodegradation over time. Different scaffolds facilitate the regeneration of different tissues. To ensure a successful regenerative procedure, it is essential to have a thorough and precise knowledge about the suitable scaffold for the required tissue. This article gives a review on the different scaffolds providing an insight into the new developmental approaches on the horizon.

Extracellular matrix pulp regeneration scaffolds
</sec><sec><title>Introduction

Regenerative dentistry has been popularized due to advancements in biologic therapies that apply growth and differentiation factors which hasten or induce natural biologic regeneration.Hermann in 1920 described the application of calcium hydroxide for vital pulp therapy which laid the foundation for regeneration of dental tissues.NygaardOstby in 1961 evaluated a revascularization method for re-establishing a pulp-dentin complex in permanent teeth with pulpal necrosis. 1

Regenerative endodontics is based on the concept of tissue engineering. Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) have been defined as biologically-based procedures designed to replace damaged structures, including dentin and root structures, as well as cells of the pulp-dentin complex with live viable tissues, preferably of the same origin, that restore the normal physiologic functions of the pulp-dentin complex. 2 ′An exhaustive search was conducted using the Pubmed and MEDLINE databases for articles with the criteria ′Platelet rich plasma′, ′Platelet rich fibrin′, ′Stem cells′, ′Natural and artificial scaffolds′ from 1982-2015. All articles were selected, with no inclusion or exclusion criteria′.

Pulp revascularization is defined as re-introduction of vascularity in the root canal system.Although blood vessels are indispensable constituents of dental pulp, pulp regeneration is considered incomplete without an odontoblastic layer lining the dentin surface, nociceptive as well as sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve fibers, in addition to interstitial fibroblasts and most importantly, stem/progenitor cells that serve to replenish all pulp cells in the regenerated pulp when they undergo apoptosis and turnover. Thus, a clear distinction between regeneration and revascularization can be made as follows:

Pulp revascularization = induction of angiogenesis in endodontically-treated root canal

Pulp regeneration = pulp revascularization + restoration of functional odontoblasts and/or nerve fibers. 3

The three key ingredients for regeneration are morphogens, progenitor/stem cells, and the extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffold. 1

Stem cells

Stem cells are undifferentiated embryonic or adult cells that continuously divide. They can divide and create additional stem cells and differentiate along a specified molecular pathway. Embryonic stem cells are totipotent and have the capacity to self-renew. In contrast, stem cells that reside within an adult organ or tissue have more restricted options, with ability to select a differentiation program from only a few possible pathways 4,5 Table 1.{Table 1}

Growth factors

Growth factors regulate either transplanted cells or endogenous cells in dental pulp-dentin regeneration.They are polypeptides or proteins that bind to specific receptors on the surface of target cells (e.g., bone morphogenetic protein [BMP] receptors) that affect a broad range of cellular activities including migration, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of all dental pulp cells, including stem/progenitor cells. 4 Bioactive cues that recruit the proper cells are critical in pulp regeneration (transforming growth factors [TGFs] β1, β3 for odontoblast differentiation and stimulation of dentin matrix). These events of repair and regeneration can be coordinated and modulated by growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), TGF, BMPs, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor (IGF). 6

Scaffolds

Scaffolds are three-dimensional (3D) porous solid biomaterials designed which

Provide a spatially correct position of cell location 1

Promote cell-biomaterial interactions, cell adhesion, and ECM deposition

Permit sufficient transport of gases, nutrients, and regulatory factors to allow cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation

Biodegrade at a controllable rate that approximates the rate of tissue regeneration

Provoke a minimal degree of inflammation or toxicity in vivo. 6

Apart from blood cells, most of the normal cells in human tissues are anchorage-dependent residing in a solid matrix called ECM. The best scaffold for an engineered tissue should be the ECM of the target tissue in its native state. 7

Ideal requirements of a scaffold

    A high porosity and an adequate pore size are necessary to facilitate cell seeding and diffusion throughout whole structure of both cells and nutrients 8

    Should allow effective transport of nutrients, oxygen, and waste 9

    Biodegradability is essential, since scaffolds need to be absorbed by the surrounding tissues without the necessity of surgical removal 8

    The rate at which degradation occurs has to coincide with the rate of tissue formation 18

    Should be biocompatible 9

    Should have adequate physical and mechanical strength. 9

    Classification of scaffolds

    Based on degradability of matrices 10,11

    Based on form 12

    Based on presence or absence of cells 13

    Based on origin 1 Table 2.

    {Table 2}

    Biological or natural scaffolds

    See Table 3.{Table 3}

    Platelet rich plasma

    Platelet rich plasma (PRP), an autologous first generation platelet concentrate with a rich source of growth factors, has been proposed as a potential addendum/substitute scaffold. 18 It is easy to prepare, rich in growth factors, and forms a 3D fibrin matrix that helps entrap the growth factors. Platelet concentration in PRP exceeds 1 million/mL, which is 5 times more than that of the normal platelet count. 19 More number of platelets increases the number of growth factors secreted by them which helps in the proliferation of stem cells to induce healing and regeneration of tissues. 20 It is a concentrated suspension of different growth factors like PDGF, TGF-b, IGF, VEGF, epidermal growth factor, and epithelial cell growth factor. These are released via degranulation of alpha granules and stimulate bone and soft-tissue healing. 21 The disadvantages of this procedure include drawing blood in young patients, the need of special equipment and reagents to prepare PRP, and the increased cost of treatment. 20

    Platelet rich fibrin

    Platelet rich fibrin (PRF) is second-generation platelet concentrate named as Choukroun′s PRF after its inventor. 22 The procedure consists of drawing blood which is collected into test tubes without an anticoagulant and is centrifuged instantaneously. A tabletop centrifuge can be used for 10 min at 3000 rpm or for 12 min at 2700 rpm. 23

    The resultant product consists of three layers:

    Acellular platelet poor plasma at peak level

    PRF clot in intermediate level

    Red fraction of red blood cells at the base level.

    The blood coagulation starts instantaneously as it comes in contact with the glass surface due to the lack of anticoagulant. 24

    Biological properties of platelet rich fibrin

    PRF can be considered as an immune concentrate with specific composition and a 3D architecture. It contains multitude of growth factors such as PDGF, TGF β1, and IGF.22

    Attributes of platelet-rich fibrin

    Ideal biomaterial for pulp-dentin complex regeneration

    Prevents the early encroachment of undesired cells, thereby acts as a viable barrier between desired and undesired cells

    Healing and inter positional biomaterial

    Accelerates wound closure and mucosal healing due to fibrin bandage and growth factor release. 25

    Biochemical analysis of platelet-rich fibrin

    PRF consists of an intimate assembly of cytokines, glycan chains, structural glycoproteins enmeshed within a slowly polymerized fibrin network. These biochemical components have well known synergistic effects on healing processes. Fibrin is the natural guide of angiogenesis. Fibrin constitutes a natural support to immunity. 22

    Collagen

    Collagen is the major component in extracellular matrices, and provides great tensile strength in tissues. As a scaffold, collagen allows for easy placement of cells and growth factors and allows for replacement with natural tissues after undergoing degradation. 27,28,29

    Advantages

    It is biocompatible, biodegradable, has a good tensile strength, simulates natural ECM of dentin, demonstrates high alkaline phosphatase activity, allows soft tissue and hard tissue formation, forms a trap for osteoinductive factors. 29,30 Collagen may also be processed into a variety of formats, including porous sponges, gels, and sheets, and can be crosslinked with chemicals to make it stronger or to alter its degradation rate. 30

    Disadvantages

    It is mechanically weak and undergoes rapid degradation, undergoes contraction (shrinkage). 31,32

    Chitosan

    Chitosan is produced commercially by deacetylation of chitin, which is the structural element in the exoskeleton of crustaceans (such as crabs and shrimp) and cell walls of fungi. The properties of chitosan affect the formation of pores in the scaffolds, thereby influencing the mechanical and biological properties. 33,34

    Advantages

    Chitosan is nontoxic, easily bioabsorbable, shows antibacterial activity, has gel forming ability, increases alkaline phosphatase activity, shows fibroblast and odontoblastic proliferation. 35,36 It is a porous scaffold that can be molded into any shape and its hydrophilic property enhances cell attachment and proliferation. 35,37

    Disadvantages

    It has low strength and inconsistent behavior with seeded cells, difficult to accurately control the size of the hydrogel pores, chemical modifications of chitosan structure could induce toxicity. 35

    Glycosoaminoglycans

    Hyaluronic acid (HA) is one of the glycosaminoglycans in ECM and plays important roles in maintaining morphologic organization by preserving extracellular spaces, and it has been reported to have excellent potential for tissue engineering. This supports osteogenesis and can provide an environment facilitating chondrogenesis when exposed to its initiating factors. 38,39

    Advantages

    It helps in differentiation of dental mesenchymal cells to odontoblasts, contributes to formation of dentin matrix and dental pulp, is biocompatible, biodegradable, bioactive, non immunogenic, and nonthrombogenic, plays a beneficial role in wound healing, can be used as an injectable scaffold and also as HA sponge. 39,40,41

    Disadvantages

    HA is highly water soluble, it degrades rapidly by enzymes such as hyaluronidase 42 , especially when not in the form of hydrogel and lacks mechanical integrity in an aqueous environment. However, these drawbacks can be overcome by cross linking and modification of HA. 42

    Demineralized or native dentin matrix

    The organic matrix of dentin is known to contain 233 total and 68 common proteins, including a variety of collagenous and non collagenous proteins. Dentin is dominated by a rich ECMand not cells. 43

    Advantages

    Demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) is nonimmunogenic and mechanically superior. 44 There is a release of bioactive molecules with DDM that signal associated dentinogenic events. 45 It shows direct induction of differentiating odontoblast-like cells and indirect matrix synthesis leading to odontoblast differentiation. 46 It has proved to be biocompatibile, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive. 47

    Disadvantages

    Tooth demineralization is time consuming (usually 2-6 days).Drawback of demineralization is that prolonged acid exposure may negatively affect noncollagenous proteins involved in new bone formation. 48,49

    Silk

    Silk-based biomaterial scaffolds have been extensively used for both soft and hard tissue engineering. 50

    Advantages

    They are biocompatible and have the ability to support the attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of many different cell types. Silk fibroin (SF) is an enzymatically degradable material, which can be processed into water insoluble implants, injectable hydro gels, and porous sponges. 50 The ability of SF to support vascularization with good anticoagulant activity and platelet response is encouraging for tissue engineering research and clinical therapy in dentistry. 51 It has good mechanical strength, elasticity, biodegradability, morphologic flexibility, oxygen and water permeability, and a slow degradation rate that enables gradual replacement of fibroin with newly formed tissue. 17,52 SF is less immunogenic and inflammatory, compared with either polylactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) or collagens. 53

    Disadvantages

    Hard tissue formation consists of osteodentin. 54 Complete degradation of silk scaffold occurs after 2 years. 55

    Artificial or synthetic scaffolds

    Polymers

    A number of synthetic polymers such as polylactic acid (PLA), poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA), polyglycolic acid (PGA), PLGA, and polyepsiloncaprolactone (PCL) have been used as scaffolds for pulp regeneration. 1

    Advantages

    The synthetic polymers are nontoxic, biodegradable, and allow precise manipulation of the physicochemical properties such as mechanical stiffness, degradation rate, porosity, and microstructure. 3 Synthetic polymers are generally degraded by simple hydrolysis, whe natural polymers are mainly degraded enzymatically. 56

    PLLA is a very strong polymer and has found many applications where structural strength is important. Experiments were carried out by Sakai et al. and Cordeiro et al.showing PLLA scaffolds promoted dental pulp cell differentiation into endothelial cells and odontoblasts. 57,58

    PGA has been used as an artificial scaffold for cell transplantation, and degrades as the cells excrete ECM. 31

    PLA is an aliphatic polyester, more hydrophobic than PGA. 59

    PLGA was used as a scaffold to demonstrate that dentin-like tissue formed and pulp-like tissue could be regenerated after 3-4 months. 60 PLGA in a 50:50 mixture has a degradation time of about 8 weeks. 61

    PCL is a slowly degrading polymer that have been used toward tissue engineering efforts in bone, either aloneor combined with hydroxyapatite. 62

    Disadvantages

    Synthetic polymers can cause a chronic or acute inflammatory host response, and localized pH decrease due to relative acidity of hydrolytically degraded byproducts. 63

    Bioceramics

    This group of scaffolds refers to calcium/phosphate materials, bioactive glasses and glass ceramics. 64 Most common biomaterials in use are calcium phosphate-based (Ca-P) bioceramics. 64 Ca-P scaffolds include β-TCP or HA and have been widely tested for bone regeneration owing to their properties of resorption, biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, osteoconductivity, bone bonding, and similarity to mineralized tissues. 3D Ca-P porous granules have proved useful in dental tissue engineering by providing favorable 3D substrate conditions for human dental pulp stem cell (hDPSC) growth and odontogenic differentiation. Addition of SiO 2 and ZnO dopants to pure TCP scaffolds increases its mechanical strength as well as cellular proliferation properties. Glass ceramics based on SiO 2 -Na 2 O-CaO-P 2 O 5 are bioactive and offer good crystallization conditions. Release of dissolution products such as Ca-P enhances the osteoblastic activity of the material. 65

    Modifications

    Scaffolds made of ceramic can be modified to obtain desired permeability, controlled dissolution rate, and specific surface characteristics to enhance cellular activity. Change in pore size and volume affects the mechanical stiffness of the scaffold. Magnesium-based glass ceramics have improved mechanical integrity and high rate of bioactivity. Niobium doped fluorapatite glass ceramic displays excellent attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of hDPSCs on its surface. 66

    Disadvantages

    Bioceramics have a time-consuming fabrication, lack of organic phase, nonhomogenous particle size and shape, large grain size, difficult porosity control, difficulty of shaping, brittleness, slow degradation rate, and high density. 66 When used alone, the bioceramics have low mechanical strength and are brittle. To overcome this disadvantage, they can be combined with polymer scaffolds. 67

    Conclusion

    REPs have emerged as viable alternatives for the treatment of immature teeth with pulpal necrosis. The clinicians should be aware of the attributes of various scaffolds so that they can select most suitable one for successful results. Combinations of various scaffoldssuch ashydroxyapatite-polymer gels can be used to compensate for their individual shortcomings, which is a significant advantage. Through the use of computer-aided design and 3D printing technologies, scaffolds like polymers can be fabricated into precise geometries with a wide range of bioactive surfaces. Such scaffolds have the potential to provide environments conducive to the growth of specific cell types such as pulpal cells. Future in regenerative endodontics is very promising owing to the discoveries and advancements in scaffold technology.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    Nil.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, and financial or nonfinancial in this article.

    Hargreaves KM Law AS Cohen′s Pathways of the Pulp Mosby Elsevier 2011 602 19 Murray PE Garcia-Godoy F Hargreaves KM Regenerative endodontics: A review of current status and a call for actionJ Endod 2007 33 377 90 Mao JJ Kim SG Zhou J Ye L Cho S Suzuki T Regenerative endodontics: Barriers and strategies for clinical translationDent Clin North Am 2012 56 639 49 Fuchs E Segre JA Stem cells: A new lease on lifeCell 2000 100 143 55 Sedgley CM Botero TM Dental stem cells and their sourcesDent Clin North Am 2012 56 549 61 Kim SG Zhou J Solomon C Zheng Y Suzuki T Chen M Effects of growth factors on dental stem/progenitor cellsDent Clin North Am 2012 56 563 75 Muschler GF Nakamoto C Griffith LG Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineeringJ Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86-A 1541 58 Patel H Bonde M Srinivasan G Biodegradable polymer scaffold for tissue engineeringTrends Biomater Artif Organs 2011 25 20 9 Saber SE Tissue engineering in endodonticsJ Oral Sci 2009 51 495 507 Marei M Regenerative Dentistry.San Rafael, Calif: Morgan & Claypool; 0 Regenerative Dentistry San Rafael, Calif: Morgan & Claypool; 2010 Arnal-Pastor M New Scaffolding Materials for Regeneration of Infarcted Myocardium [Doctoral Thesis]: Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 3 New Scaffolding Materials for Regeneration of Infarcted Myocardium [Doctoral Thesis]: Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 2013 Sureshchandra B Roma M Regeneration of dental pulp: A myth or hypeEndodontology 2013 13 139 54 Abou Neel EA Chrzanowski W Salih VM Kim HW Knowles JC Tissue engineering in dentistryJ Dent 2014 B 915 28 Jadhav GR Shah N Logani A Platelet-rich plasma supplemented revascularization of an immature tooth associated with a periapical lesion in a 40-year-old manCase Rep Dent 2014 2014 479584 Jadhav GR Shah D Raghavendra SS Autologus Platelet Rich Fibrin aided Revascularization of an immature, non-vital permanent tooth with apical periodontitis: A case reportJ Nat Sci Biol Med 2015 6 224 5 Vemuri S Kotha RS Raghunath RG Kandregula CR Root canal revascularization via blood clotting in regenerative endodontics: Essentials and expectationsJ Dr NTR Univ Health Sci 2013 2 235 8 Yang JW Zhang YF Sun ZY Song GT Chen Z Dental pulp tissue engineering with bFGF-incorporated silk fibroin scaffoldsJ Biomater Appl 2015 30 221 9 Jadhav GR Shah N Logani A Comparative outcome of revascularization in bilateral, non-vital, immature maxillary anterior teeth supplemented with or without platelet rich plasma: A case seriesJ Conserv Dent 2013 16 568 72 Lata P Chhabra A Jindal V Kaur D Thakur AK In-vivo clinical evaluation of regenerative endodontics in immature necrotic permanent teeth with open apexDent J Adv Stud 2015 3 26 33 Jadhav G Shah N Logani A Revascularization with and without platelet-rich plasma in nonvital, immature, anterior teeth: A pilot clinical studyJ Endod 2012 38 1581 7 Kaur P Puneet VD Platelet-rich plasma: A novel bioengineering conceptTrends Biomater Artif Organs 2011 25 86 90 Hotwani K Sharma K Platelet rich fibrin - A novel acumen into regenerative endodontic therapyRestor Dent Endod 2014 39 1 6 Dohan DM Choukroun J Diss A Dohan SL Dohan AJ Mouhyi J Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate.Part III: Leucocyte activation: A new feature for platelet concentrates?Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006 101 e51 5 Dohan DM Choukroun J Diss A Dohan SL Dohan AJ Mouhyi J Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF): A second-generation platelet concentrate.Part I: Technological concepts and evolutionOral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006 101 e37 44 Shivashankar VY Johns DA Vidyanath S Sam G Combination of platelet rich fibrin, hydroxyapatite and PRF membrane in the management of large inflammatory periapical lesionJ Conserv Dent 2013 16 261 4 Narang I Mittal N Mishra N A comparative evaluation of the blood clot, platelet-rich plasma, and platelet-rich fibrin in regeneration of necrotic immature permanent teeth: A clinical studyContemp Clin Dent 2015 6 63 8 Yamauchi N Yamauchi S Nagaoka H Duggan D Zhong S Lee SM Tissue engineering strategies for immature teeth with apical periodontitisJ Endod 2011 37 390 7 Sumita Y Honda MJ Ohara T Tsuchiya S Sagara H Kagami H Performance of collagen sponge as a 3-D scaffold for tooth-tissue engineeringBiomaterials 2006 27 3238 48 Prescott RS Alsanea R Fayad MI Johnson BR Wenckus CS Hao J In vivo generation of dental pulp-like tissue by using dental pulp stem cells, a collagen scaffold, and dentin matrix protein 1 after subcutaneous transplantation in miceJ Endod 2008 34 421 6 Nasir NM Raha MG Kadri KN Rampado M Azlan CA The study of morphological structure, phase structure and molecular structure of collagen-PEO 600K blends for tissue engineering applicationAm J Biochem Biotechnol 2006 2 175 9 Galler KM Scaffolds for pulp regeneration and repair.In: Goldberg M, editorThe Dental Pulp: Biology, Pathology, and Regenerative Therapies Scaffolds for pulp regeneration and repair In: Goldberg M, editor The Dental Pulp: Biology, Pathology, and Regenerative Therapies Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2014 p 252 Vaissiere G Chevallay B Herbage D Damour O Comparative analysis of different collagen-based biomaterials as scaffolds for long-term culture of human fibroblastsMed Biol Eng Comput 2000 38 205 10 Hatab TA Kochaji N Issa N Nadra R Saleh M Rahmo A In vivo and immunohistochemical study of dentin and pulp tissue regeneration in the root canalJ Chem Pharm Res 2015 7 302 10 Wikipedia Contributors Chitosan[Last cited on Jan ]. 1]. Chitosan Wikipedia Available from: https://wwwenwikipediaorg/wiki/Chitosan [Last cited on 2016 Jan 11] Croisier F Jérôme C Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineeringEur Polym J 2013 49 780 92 Matsunaga T Yanagiguchi K Yamada S Ohara N Ikeda T Hayashi Y Chitosan monomer promotes tissue regeneration on dental pulp woundsJ Biomed Mater Res A 2006 76 711 20 Muzzarelli RA Chitosan composites with inorganic, morphogenetic proteins and stem cells for bone regenerationCarbohydr Polym 2011 83 1433 45 Tziafas D Amar S Staubli A Meyer JM Ruch JV Effects of glycosaminoglycans on in vitro mouse dental cellsArch Oral Biol 1988 33 735 40 Inuyama Y Kitamura C Nishihara T Morotomi T Nagayoshi M Tabata Y Effects of hyaluronic acid sponge as a scaffold on odontoblastic cell line and amputated dental pulpJ Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010 92 120 8 Tan L Wang J Yin S Zhu W Zhou W Cao Y Regeneration of dentin-pulp-like tissue using an injectable tissue engineering techniqueRSC Adv 2015 5 59723 37 Yuan Z Nie H Wang S Lee CH Li A Fu SY Biomaterial selection for tooth regenerationTissue Eng Part B Rev 2011 17 373 88 Bronzino J Tissue Engineering and Artificial OrgansBoca Raton: CRC/Taylor and Francis; 6 Tissue Engineering and Artificial Organs Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor and Francis; 2006 Park ES Cho HS Kwon TG Jang SN Lee SH An CH Proteomics analysis of human dentin reveals distinct protein expression profilesJ Proteome Res 2009 8 1338 46 Guo W He Y Zhang X Lu W Wang C Yu H The use of dentin matrix scaffold and dental follicle cells for dentin regenerationBiomaterials 2009 30 6708 23 Liu G Xu G Gao Z Liu Z Xu J Wang J Demineralized dentin matrix induces odontoblastic differentiation of dental pulp stem cellsCells Tissues Organs 2016 201 65 76 Goldberg M Smith AJ Cells and extracellular matrices of dentin and pulp: A biological basis for repair and tissue engineeringCrit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004 15 13 27 Murata M Sato D Hino J Akazawa T Tazaki J Ito K Acid-insoluble human dentin as carrier material for recombinant human BMP-2J Biomed Mater Res A 2012 100 571 7 Movin S Borring-Møller G Regeneration of infrabony periodontal defects in humans after implantation of allogenic demineralized dentinJ Clin Periodontol 1982 9 141 7 Pietrzak WS Ali SN Chitturi D Jacob M Woodell-May JE BMP depletion occurs during prolonged acid demineralization of bone: Characterization and implications for graft preparationCell Tissue Bank 2011 12 81 8 Jindal SK Silk scaffolds for dental tissue engineering.In: Kundu S, editorSilk Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Silk scaffolds for dental tissue engineering In: Kundu S, editor Silk Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Amsterdam: Woodhead Publishing; 2014 p 403-28 Blitterswijk C Thomsen P Tissue EngineeringLondon: Academic Press; 8 Tissue Engineering London: Academic Press; 2008 Park JY Yang C Jung IH Lim HC Lee JS Jung UW Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using cells-implanted nano-hydroxyapatite coated silk scaffoldsBiomater Res 2015 19 7 Meinel L Hofmann S Karageorgiou V Kirker-Head C McCool J Gronowicz G The inflammatory responses to silk films in vitro and in vivoBiomaterials 2005 26 147 55 Xu WP Zhang W Asrican R Kim HJ Kaplan DL Yelick PC Accurately shaped tooth bud cell-derived mineralized tissue formation on silk scaffoldsTissue Eng Part A 2008 14 549 57 Cao Y Wang B Biodegradation of silk biomaterialsInt J Mol Sci 2009 10 1514 24 Gunatillake PA Adhikari R Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineeringEur Cell Mater 2003 5 1 16 Sakai VT Zhang Z Dong Z Neiva KG Machado MA Shi S SHED differentiate into functional odontoblasts and endotheliumJ Dent Res 2010 89 791 6 Cordeiro MM Dong Z Kaneko T Zhang Z Miyazawa M Shi S Dental pulp tissue engineering with stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teethJ Endod 2008 34 962 9 Gentile P Chiono V Carmagnola I Hatton PV An overview of poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineeringInt J Mol Sci 2014 15 3640 59 Huang GT Yamaza T Shea LD Djouad F Kuhn NZ Tuan RS Stem/progenitor cell-mediated de novo regeneration of dental pulp with newly deposited continuous layer of dentin in an in vivo modelTissue Eng Part A 2010 16 605 15 Singhal AR Agrawal CM Athanasiou KA Salient degradation features of a 50:50 PLA/PGA scaffold for tissue engineeringTissue Eng 1996 2 197 207 Horst OV Chavez MG Jheon AH Desai T Klein OD Stem cell and biomaterials research in dental tissue engineering and regenerationDent Clin North Am 2012 56 495 520 Chan G Mooney DJ New materials for tissue engineering: Towards greater control over the biological responseTrends Biotechnol 2008 26 382 92 Sharma S Srivastava D Grover S Sharma V Biomaterials in tooth tissue engineering: A reviewJ Clin Diagn Res 2014 8 309 15 Burdick J Mauck R Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering ApplicationsVienna: Springer; 1 Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications Vienna: Springer; 2011 Garg T Bilandi A Kapoor B Kumar S Joshi R Scaffold: Tissue engineering and regenerative medicineInt Res J Pharm 2011 2 37 42 Khanna-Jain R Mannerström B Vuorinen A Sándor GK Suuronen R Miettinen S Osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells on â-tricalcium phosphate/poly (l-lactic acid/caprolactone) three-dimensional scaffoldsJ Tissue Eng 2012 3 1 11

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.