Email this article Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopy characteristics of universal adhesive in primary tooth dentin: An in vitro study
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to evaluate the adhesion of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive
to primary tooth dentin by measuring shear bond strength (SBS) and observing morphological
changes with scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of 60 primary canine teeth were randomly
divided into 5 groups (n = 12). The study groups were (1) Phosphoric acid etching + Adper Single
Bond 2 (control), (2) phosphoric acid etching + Scotchbond Universal (etch‑and‑rinse), (3) Scotchbond
Universal (self‑etch), (4) phosphoric acid etching + Scotchbond Universal + resin, and (5) Scotchbond
Universal + resin. Composite cylinders were built on the tooth surface, and 10 samples in each
group were selected for SBS testing and identification of the failure modes. Two samples from each
group were observed by SEM. One‑way ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc
test were used for data analysis P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The results showed that SBS in Group 1 was significantly lower than in Groups 2, 3, and
4 (all P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.98), or between
Groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.97). There was no significant difference between Groups 2 and 4 (P = 0.999)
or between Groups 1 and 5 (P = 0.156). Mixed and cohesive failures were more frequent in Groups 2,
3 and 4. SEM observations showed that applying phosphoric acid to the dentin before Scotchbond
Universal adhesive resulted in more open dentinal tubules and more resin tag impregnation.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in SBS between Scotchbond Universal Adhesive in
etch‑and‑rinse and self‑etching modes. The SBS of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive in etch‑and‑rinse
mode was greater than Adper Single Bond 2.
Key Words: Adhesive, bond strength, primary teeth, scanning electron microscopy, universal
to primary tooth dentin by measuring shear bond strength (SBS) and observing morphological
changes with scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, a total of 60 primary canine teeth were randomly
divided into 5 groups (n = 12). The study groups were (1) Phosphoric acid etching + Adper Single
Bond 2 (control), (2) phosphoric acid etching + Scotchbond Universal (etch‑and‑rinse), (3) Scotchbond
Universal (self‑etch), (4) phosphoric acid etching + Scotchbond Universal + resin, and (5) Scotchbond
Universal + resin. Composite cylinders were built on the tooth surface, and 10 samples in each
group were selected for SBS testing and identification of the failure modes. Two samples from each
group were observed by SEM. One‑way ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc
test were used for data analysis P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The results showed that SBS in Group 1 was significantly lower than in Groups 2, 3, and
4 (all P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between Groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.98), or between
Groups 3 and 4 (P = 0.97). There was no significant difference between Groups 2 and 4 (P = 0.999)
or between Groups 1 and 5 (P = 0.156). Mixed and cohesive failures were more frequent in Groups 2,
3 and 4. SEM observations showed that applying phosphoric acid to the dentin before Scotchbond
Universal adhesive resulted in more open dentinal tubules and more resin tag impregnation.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in SBS between Scotchbond Universal Adhesive in
etch‑and‑rinse and self‑etching modes. The SBS of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive in etch‑and‑rinse
mode was greater than Adper Single Bond 2.
Key Words: Adhesive, bond strength, primary teeth, scanning electron microscopy, universal
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.