This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Tricho-dento-osseous syndrome (TDO) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder with complete penetrance.
Several different mutations in homeobox 3 gene (DLX3) has been identified in individuals with TDO.
Dental management of TDO is challenging due to several reasons such as technical difficulties of endodontic treatment of molars with taurodontism, lack of appropriate abutment for prosthodontic and orthodontic appliances, disturbances in tooth eruption, and behavioral management of young patients needing complicated treatments at early age.
Although there are several articles reporting TDO, scant attention has been paid to the management of dental problems. The reported case is also remarkable because it shows some uncommon manifestations on the syndrome. Thus, the purpose of this literature review and casereport is to describe manifestations and dental treatment approaches to TDO and discuss the challenges of comprehensive team-based dental treatment.
A 12-year-old girl was seen in the Pediatric Department at Dental School of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. She was referred by a general dental practitioner, requesting comprehensive dental management. Her last visit to dentist was about two years earlier with the chief complaint of bad anterior teeth.
She had been diagnosed with TDO syndrome, 7 years previously. She was the only child of healthy, nonconsanguineous parents. She had been delivered naturally at term with a normal birth weight. The diagnosis had been made by a team of qualified specialists (pediatric developmental specialist, pediatric endocrinologist, and radiology specialist), based on history, physical examinations, radiographic findings, and laboratory tests. Genetic investigations to find DLX3 mutation was not carried out. There was no familial history of similar congenital syndrome or dental abnormalities. Thus, the case was considered to be the product of a sporadic mutation.
The patient had normal intellectual abilities. Despite being shy, she was eager to talk about her educational goals, hoping that her achievements would compensate for her physical shortcomings.
Past medical and dental history
During the past year, the patient had received a corneal transplantation of the right eye as a treatment for idiopathic corneal ulceration. Unfortunately, the transplanted cornea was rejected.
She had also been diagnosed to have stone-forming kidneys. Several stones were successfully dissolved, and the patient was receiving 500 mg D-Penicillamine daily as a prophylactic measure. History also revealed mild congenital heart disease (a ventricular septal defect which was successfully closed surgically during the first years of her life) for which she was not receiving any medication or treatment, as decided by the cardiologist.
According to previous dental records, she had a history of pulp necrosis and multiple dental abscesses. Endodontic treatment of teeth numbered 11, 21, 22, 36, 32, 42, 42, and 46 (FDI system) had been performed about two years ago. Tooth number 42 had been restored using a fiber post. Restorative treatment of teeth numbered 16, 15, 26, 36, and 46 had been also performed using prefabricated stainless steel crown. Teeth numbered 11, 21, 22, 32, 42, and 42 had been restored using composite resin material.
Physical and dental examinations
Although the patient could walk with no problem, a mild bilateral bowing of legs was detectable. She was noted to have signs of mandibular prognatia and frontal bossing of the skull. Her hair and nails were normal, but her skin was rather dry. Microstomia, labial fissures, and rejected corneal transplant were also notified (a) Rejected corneal transplant (b) Microstomia and labial fissures.
Intraoral examinations revealed severe generalized enamel defects affecting all teeth. Other findings included discolored teeth, microdontia, skeletal and dental class III malocclusion, anterior open-bite, posterior cross-bite, deep periodontal pockets (teeth numbered 15, 11, 21, 22, 25, 26, 31, and 41), marginal gingival inflammation of maxillary anterior teeth, and hyperplastic inflamed gingiva covering teeth numbered 23, 24, 34, 33, and 44 Intraoral frontal view.
Radiographic examinations
No abnormalities were found on radiographs of the hips, vertebras, and upper limbs. The radiologist reported a mild bilateral tibial bowing. Main features revealed by dental panoramic radiography were as follows: taurodontism of permanent molars, forcation radiolucency in tooth 47, periapical radiolucencies in the anterior mandibular region and around the apex of tooth 26, and missing mandibular central incisors (teeth numbered 31 and 41) Initial dental panoramic radiograph.
Treatment plan and interventions
Individual treatment plan was established using a team-based approach. Patient and parents were instructed to improve routine oral hygiene practices and also were instructed to apply home-based primary/preventive modalities including alcohol-free 0.05% sodium fluoride and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouth rinses, and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) paste. Thorough dental prophylaxis was performed using rotary prophylaxis brush and nonabrasive prophylaxis paste. Professional application of 5% sodium fluoride varnish was performed every 3 months. Oral hygiene compliance and dental condition were assessed in scheduled monthly visits for the first 6 months and 3-monthly intervals afterward.
Regarding the low rate of pulp treatment success in TDO, Mandibular teeth at 12-months-recall.
Furthermore, the patient had esthetic concerns about her smile. Despite having complex orthodontic problems such as malposed teeth and excess space, the team decided that orthodontic treatment was not possible. Bond failure of orthodontic brackets to the defective enamel and presence of teeth that were partially or totally covered with gingiva were factors contraindicating orthodontic treatment. The team also concluded that the remaining teeth were not inappropriate conditions to support fixed prosthesis. A removable overdenture for the upper arch was fabricated in order to obtain acceptable aesthetic and functional results, and her smile without embarrassment was seen for the first time Interim maxillary overdenture.
Furthermore considering the high risk for developing psychological problems, the patient was referred for psychiatric consultation, although during the next recalls, parents stated that they did not feel the need for consultation.
TDO is a rare congenital syndrome mainly affecting hair, teeth, and bones. Involvement of other organs such as flat and/or brittle fingernails, clinodactyly, and skin lesions are also reported.
Several factors make dental treatment for TDO patients a challenge for dentists. Psychological considerations, challenges of endodontic treatment of taurodonts, and problems associated with bonding of adhesive restorative materials to defective enamel are some of these factors. Different aspects of treatment planning for TDO patients are discussed next.
Psychological considerations
In patients suffering TDO, dental treatments usually start at an early age. Although craniofacial bones are significantly affected, intellectual capabilities remain untouched.
Numerous psychological problems are associated with craniofacial anomalies in children and adolescents.
The following strategies can be applied by the dentist in order to reduce psychological problems:
Referring the patient to a mental health professional:
It is wise for the dentist to refer child and adolescent patients suffering syndromes with negative influence on esthetics (including TDO), to a mental health professional. Establishing appropriate psychological counseling, diagnosis, and therapies are normally beyond the dentist's capability.
Avoiding unrequested attention as much as possible:
Patients with facial aesthetic problems, usually feel uncomfortable with behaviors such as staring, asking about, or remarking on their condition.
Scheduling appointments for patients with similar conditions:
When in physician's or dentist's waiting room, people tend to talk and share their experiences. Meeting other parents and children in similar situations, helps them feel that they are not alone.
Intermediate esthetic treatments:
Despite the fact that performing definitive esthetic dental treatments is usually not possible in adolescents, intermediate treatments can improve their appearance and self-confidence.
Endodontic considerations
Considering the fact that successful endodontic treatment of taurodontism has rarely been reported,
Another endodontic challenge for TDO patient is early occurrence of pulpal disease while the apex is still open. Having a weak enamel, the teeth in TDO patients are more susceptible to dental caries and attrition which can lead to pulpal exposure, periapical lesions, and the need for endodontic treatment at young age. Pulp treatment of open apex teeth may result in the need for apexification, apexogenesis, or regenerative endodontic treatments. Considering the challenges mentioned above surrounding endodontic treatment of taurodonts, vital pulp therapy instead of full pulp extirpation is the treatment of choice.
In addition, idiopathic pulp necrosis occurred in tooth number 47 in the present case despite being partially covered with gingiva. A possible theory leading to pulp necrosis of the tooth is preeruptive coronal resorption which was confirmed by clinical exploration. Pre-eruptive coronal resorption has been reported in several cases of AI.
The following advices may decrease the risk of endodontic failure: Careful exploration for additional orifices and canals using magnification:
Adequate irrigation and root canal disinfection:
Repeated irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, and the use of ultrasonic irrigation.
Using a combination of root canal filling techniques:
lateral compaction technique in the apical region and vertical compaction technique in the pulp chamber.
Vital pulp therapy in young permanent teeth:
For teeth with open apices, vital pulp therapy instead of full pulp extirpation is the treatment of choice.
Providing a perfect coronal seal after root canal treatment:
A full-coverage technique is preferred.
Failure of endodontic treatment is highly expected, thus close follow-ups are crucial for early detection. Preservation of the alveolar bone for definitive future prosthetic or implant treatments:
Attempt should be made to maintain teeth with poor long-term prognosis via endodontic treatment.
Restorative considerations
Because of rarity of TDO and the fact that dental problems are the most consistent features of the syndrome, the condition is commonly mistaken for AI. Although limited evidence is available regarding restorative treatment is TDO, a satisfying amount of literature is available relating to AI.
As with AI which is a condition of somehow the same origin with TDO,
The use of direct restorative materials such as amalgam or adhesive resins in TDO is quite challenging. As with AI, TDO teeth are at greater risk of marginal fracture because of the defective dental tissue surrounding restorations. Amalgam restorations can be used successfully in mildly affected posterior teeth.
Direct resin composite restorations for esthetic zone are recommended to restore esthetics and prevent attrition of anterior teeth in young patients. Restoration using adhesive materials (composite resin and glass ionomer) have occasionally been reported to be more successful than amalgam restorations.
The reduced longevity of adhesive restorations could be best explained by poor quality and quantity of enamel which leads to inferior etching pattern and insufficient bonding area as less enamel and more dentin is engaged. Decrease in bond strength results in increased marginal leakage, lower retention, and reduced longevity of adhesive restorations.
Several modifications to conventional adhesive systems have been suggested in order to improve the bonding quality in AI (such as deproteinization of enamel using sodium hypochlorite), but the results were not promising.
Full coronal coverage of primary (final restoration) and permanent (interim restoration) molars using prefabricated stainless steel crowns is recommended in young patients with TDO, in order to prevent dental caries, pulp infection, attrition, and decrease in vertical occlusal dimension.
It is suggested to avoid the use of endodontic posts for prosthesis retention in permanent molars affected with taurodontism. It is also recommended not to use taurodonts as abutments for either prosthetic or orthodontic appliances.
As a summary, the following recommendations are advised for restoration of TDO teeth in adolescents:
Teeth of the esthetic zone:
Interim composite resin restoration is performed until definitive treatment can be performed.
Posterior teeth:
Mildly affected teeth can be restored by direct restorative materials (either composite resin or amalgam) and provisional stainless steel crown restoration is placed for moderately or severely affected teeth until definitive treatment can be performed.
Use of overdentures:
Partial or complete overdentures can be used as interim treatment until a definitive treatment can be performed.
Close follow-ups:
Considering lower success rate of restorative treatments in TDO, close follow-ups are recommended to assessed the need for repair or replacement.
Periodontal considerations
There is limited literature discussing periodontal status of TDO patients. Although teeth with taurodontism seem to be at lower risk of periodontal diseases due to the more apically placed apex and are usually in normal periodontal condition.
Although periodontal status in patients with disorders such as AI does not seem to differ from normal patients,
Preventive considerations
TDO patients are at a greater risk for dental caries and tooth loss due to several factors, thus, stricter preventive measures are needed to maintain oral and dental health. Delivering instructions on oral care, plaque control, and personal dietary advice should be reinforced and monitored on repeated occasions.
Prescription of self-applied dental care products such as alcohol-free sodium fluoride and chlorhexidine mouth rinses, CPP-ACP paste is recommended in order to prevent dental caries and even reverse or stop lesion progression. The use of desensitizing fluoride toothpastes (by a soft toothbrush) and products containing potassium nitrate is also indicated in case of tooth sensitivity.
Patients should receive both standard and tailored dietary advice including reduced intake of sugary or acidic food and beverages (e.g., sour foods, citrus juice, cola, and any carbonated drink), encouraged consumption of alkaline or neutral foods (e.g., legume, milk, and water) and use of xylitol-containing chewing gums.
Dental management of patients with TDO is a long time process starting at an early age. Although tooth loss might be inevitable, saving the teeth for as long as possible is important for an appropriate craniofacial and psychological development as well as maintaining alveolar dimensions. Achievement of this goal requires collaboration of a multi-disciplinary team of professionals.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient and her caregiver has given consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient and her caregiver understand that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.