This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This study aimed to assess the color change of two amine-free dual-cure resin cements following aging in comparison with a light-cure resin cement.
This in vitro, experimental study evaluated 6 groups (n = 10), including three groups of cements bonded to feldspathic porcelain and three groups of resin cements alone. Panavia V5 (Kuraray) and G-CEM LinkForce (GC) dual-cure resin cements and Choice 2 (Bisco) light-cure resin cements were bonded to porcelain according to the manufacturers' instructions. The color parameters of the groups were measured before and after 5000 thermal cycles by spectrophotometry. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α =0.05).
The color change (ΔE) of the cement groups alone was significantly greater than that of porcelain-bonded cements. The ΔE of G-CEM LinkForce cement group was significantly higher than that of Panavia V5 group (P = 0.020), and the ΔE of the latter group was significantly higher than that of Choice 2 cement group (P = 0.021).
Considering the color change of cements evaluated in this study, Choice 2 and Panavia V5 cements bonded to porcelain showed acceptable color change, which indicates that they are suitable for cementation of esthetic dental restorations. Ceramic laminates have become an ideal esthetic treatment for anterior restorations. The resin cement discoloration can affect final appearance of these restorations. Besides that, exposed resin cement line can lead to the esthetic problem over time.
Ceramic laminate veneers are conservative indirect restorations used to improve the smile design and enhance the color, form, and function of unaesthetic teeth.
The conservative tooth preparation design for laminate veneers is responsible for low thickness of these restorations. Different types of ceramic veneers are available that are made of feldspathic and glass ceramics, and are thin and translucent. Thus, they allow the passage of light.
Color change of resin cements is a common problem particularly for translucent restorations. Color change of restoration is the primary reason for the replacement of esthetic restorations.
Discoloration of cement may occur due to some extrinsic and intrinsic factors.
The intrinsic factors that are responsible for discoloration of ceramic restorations are mainly related to the properties of the resin cement such as its chemical composition (photo-initiator, filler type, matrix composition), type of polymerization, conversion rate, and presence of unreacted monomers.
Several types of resin cements are used for cementation of ceramic laminate veneers. Many dental clinicians prefer the light-cure cements because better control of the cement by the use of curing light can enhance the procedural steps and increase the clinical working time.
Dual-cure resin cements contain tertiary amine (aromatic amine) and benzoyl peroxide and tend to darken over time. In contrast, the color of camphorquinone photo-initiator and aliphatic amine that are commonly incorporated in the composition of light-cure resin cements is more stable.
Sample size calculation
According to the Dede et al.'s study (2016) and using one-way ANOVA Power Analysis PASS11, considering α = 0.05 and β = 0.2, and the mean standard deviation ΔE = 0.57 and Effect size = 0.5, the minimum sample required for each of the six group of study was 9 samples, in which increased to 10 in this study to have more power.
The study groups (n = 10) in this in vitro experimental study were as follows:
Group 1: Choice 2 (Bisco) light-cure resin cement and medium-opacity feldspathic porcelain Group 2: G-CEM LinkForce (GC, Tokyo, Japan) dual-cure resin cement and medium-opacity feldspathic porcelain Group 3: Panavia V5 (Kuraray Medical, Tokyo, Japan) dual-cure resin cement and medium-opacity feldspathic porcelain Group 4: Choice 2 (Bisco) light-cure resin cement Group 5: G-CEM LinkForce (GC, Tokyo, Japan) dual-cure resin cement Group 6: Panavia V5 (Kuraray Medical, Tokyo, Japan) dual-cure resin cement.
Preparation of porcelain specimens
A total of 30 feldspathic porcelain specimens (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Japan) with medium-opacity translucency and A1 color shade were fabricated in a laboratory with 10 mm diameter and 0.5 mm thickness. The porcelain surface was then glazed according to the manufacturer's instructions and then cleaned in an ultrasonic bath (Tecno-Gaz S.p.A., Parma, Italy) for 10 min. Each specimen was checked using a digital five-point caliper (Digital Caliper, Messen, Danyang, China) to have the above-mentioned thickness and evaluate with a stereomicroscope (Magnus, Magnus Opto Systems, India Pvt. Ltd.) to have no crack.
Preparation of resin cement specimens
Specimens were fabricated of Choice 2 light-cure resin cement (Group 4), and G-CEM LinkForce and Panavia V5 dual-cure resin cements (Groups 5 and 6) with translucent color, measuring 0.3 mm in thickness and 10 mm in diameter (minimum possible thickness for the respective tests). A stainless-steel mold with 0.3 mm depth was fabricated for this purpose. The resin cement was applied into the mold. A Mylar strip followed by a glass slab were placed over the resin cement to obtain a smooth surface. Next, 2.5 kg static load was applied for 20 s to standardize the thickness of all resin cement specimens. Next, light-curing was performed using an LED curing unit (Bluephase N, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) with a light intensity of 1200 mW/cm 2for 40 s. Curing was performed in four points using the overlapping technique. The light intensity was checked prior to each time of use with a radiometer (LM1; Woodpecker, Japan).
Bonding of cement to porcelain
In 3 out of 6 groups, resin cement was bonded to porcelain specimens such that in all the respective 3 groups, the porcelain surface was first prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. For this purpose, the porcelain surface was first etched with 9.5% buffered hydrofluoric (HF) acid (Porcelain Etchant, Bisco) for 90 s. The etchant was applied on the inferior surface of the disc. The surface was rinsed and dried after 90 s. Next, in Group 1 (Choice 2 resin cement), two-component silane was mixed and applied on the porcelain disc after 15 min. Porcelain Bond (Bisco, USA) was then applied. In Group 2 (G-CEM LinkForce resin cement), G-Multi Primer (GC) was applied on the porcelain surface after HF acid etching and dried with air spray. In Group 3 (Panavia V5 resin cement), Ceramic Primer (Kuraray Noritake Dental) was applied on the porcelain surface after HF acid etching and dried. The porcelain discs were then placed in stainless steel molds, and resin cement was applied over them. The cement was then covered with a Mylar strip and a glass slab was placed over it to obtain a smooth surface. Next, 2.6 kg static load was applied for 20 s to standardize the thickness of resin cement. Light curing was then performed using an LED curing unit (Bluephase N) with a light intensity of 1200 mW/cm 2for 40 s. Curing was performed through the porcelain laminate. Light curing was performed at 4 points for 40 s using the overlapping technique, and the mold was then removed.
Color assessment
The L*, a* and b* color parameters were measured by a spectrophotometer (Ci64, X-Rite, Grandville, MI) against a white background using the CIE L*a*b* color space.
Aging and final color assessment
The specimens underwent thermocycling for 5000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C with a dwell time of 30 s and a transfer time of 10 s in a thermocycler (Dorsa, Tehran, Iran). This protocol corresponded to 6 months of clinical service.
Statistical analysis
Normal distribution of data was confirmed using Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The effects of cement type, porcelain attendance, and their interactions on ΔE were evaluated by two-way ANOVA. Pairwise comparisons of tested groups were made with Tukey's post hoc test. The level of significancy was set on 0.05. Data were analyzed with SPSS software version 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
The measures of central dispersion for the L*, a* and b* color parameters in the study groups before and after aging are presented in
Choice 2 and G CEM Linkforce showed the least and the most degree of discoloration respectively when they are considered without porcelain veneer. In a comparison of cement discoloration with a porcelain veneer, the same order was repeated and Choice 2 had the least ΔE, while G CEM Linkforce showed the most ΔE among other cements.
The Tukey's honestly significant difference test was applied for pairwise comparisons of the groups and revealed that the mean ΔE of Choice 2 (ΔE = 1.73) was significantly lower than that of Panavia V5 (ΔE = 3.13) (P = 0.021). The mean ΔE of Panavia V5 (ΔE = 3.13) was also significantly lower than that of G-CEM LinkForce (ΔE = 4.92) (P = 0.020). Moreover, the color change of porcelain-bonded cement groups was significantly lower than that of cement groups alone (P = 0.034) as illustrated in
Comparison of ΔE of the study groups after aging.
Increased demand for esthetic dental restorations has led to increased use of ceramic laminate veneers in contemporary dentistry. The color match of restoration with the adjacent teeth, its durability, and color stability are among the important factors in achieving patient satisfaction.
The polymerization of polymerizable resin components in dual-cure cements is influenced by the color of restoration and resin material.
In order to assess the clinical performance of dental materials, in vitro studies should simulate the intraoral environment. Several methods have been suggested for aging of resin cements such as water storage, immersion in coloring agents such as coffee and grape juice, aging with xenon lamp and UV-B lamp, and thermocycling.
Two series of specimens were evaluated in this study. The first series included resin cement specimens bonded to porcelain. Alkurt and Duymus,
In this study, all groups showed changes in L*, a* and b* parameters after aging. The reduction in L* parameter is manifested by a reduction in lightness. The increase in a* and b* parameters indicate increased redness and yellowness of specimens, respectively. According to the current findings, the a* parameter decreased after aging in Choice 2 cement while it increased in dual-cure cements. In addition, the b* parameter increased in both dual-cure cements but remained constant in Choice 2 cement. Increased a* and b* factors and yellowness of specimens are due to the presence of unreacted camphorquinone and oxidized amines. Hydrolytic degradation of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate and bisphenol-A glycidyl dimethacrylate in resin cements is another reason for this finding.
Resin cements are divided into three groups of chemical cure, light cure, and dual-cure based on the type of polymerization. Selection of the type of polymerization of resin cement is highly important because depending on the chemical composition of cement, it can cause irreversible color change of ceramic restoration. Most self-cure or dual-cure resin cements contain benzoyl peroxide and tertiary amine, that are responsible for the initiation of polymerization reactions.
Higher discoloration of G-CEM LinkForce than Panavia V5 can be due to the fact that Panavia V5 has a new initiator system for chemical polymerization. The formulation of this new initiator system has not yet been disclosed by the manufacturer; however, G-CEM LinkForce contains benzoyl peroxide in its formulation.
In a study by Alkurt and Duymus, Panavia V5 cement showed a discoloration below the clinically detectable threshold of ΔE <3.3, which was in agreement with the current findings in Panavia V5 plus porcelain group.
Considering the scarcity of studies on color change of G-CEM LinkForce cement, the existing literature for comparison with the current findings was limited and controversial. In general, due to the new formulation of the two dual-cure resin cements evaluated in this study, and lack of adequate information regarding their discoloration, further studies are required to cast a final judgment regarding their quality and clinical service in the oral environment for cementation of esthetic ceramic restorations of the anterior teeth. Moreover, some limitations existed in this study. For example, just one thickness of porcelain and also one shade of porcelain and resin cement had been used for standardization. It was also very difficult to simulate aging like the oral environment. The effect of other external factors such as food discoloration, plaque accumulation, and exposure to different pHs had not been considered.
Within the limitations of this study, the following conclusions can be drawn:
Choice 2 light-cure resin cement experienced minimum color change among the study groups and its discoloration was below the clinically detectable threshold by the human eye in both groups with/without porcelain Panavia V5 dual-cure cement showed acceptable color change when used with porcelain, which makes it suitable for use in areas where the restoration margin is not visible Discoloration of dual-cure cements seems to be higher than light-cure cements and therefore, their application in the esthetic zone should be done with caution.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Dr. Mohamad-Javad Kharazifard for doing statistical analysis.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.