Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composites subjected to thermocycling aging

Abstract

Background: Surface smoothness considered to be a significant part of the appearance and
success of the restorative materials. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of four
different polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composite materials when subjected
to thermocycling.
Materials and Methods: This research was designed as a comparative study. Four resin composites
were used which are: Nanofill composite (Filtek Supreme XT), nanohybrid composite (Tetric
EvoCeram), microfill composite (Renamel Microfill), and microhybrid composite (Filtek Z250).
Sixty disk‑shaped specimens of each resin composite were prepared then divided into four groups
according to the polishing system (n = 15); which were Sof‑Lex Spiral, Diatech Shapeguard, Venus
Supra, and Astropol. The specimens of each group were polished following the manufactures’
instructions, then surface roughness, Ra values in μm were measured initially and after the specimens
subjected to thermal cycling. The influence of resin composites, polishing systems, thermocycling,
and their interaction effects on surface roughness (Ra mean values) was statistically analyzed mainly
by using the repeated measures two‑way analysis of variance test, whereas the Bonferroni’’s post
hoc test was applied for pair‑wise comparisons. P ≤ 0.05 was used as the significant level.
Results: The results of this study revealed that Filtek Supreme XT recorded significantly the lowest
mean surface roughness (Ra) of 0.2533 ± 0.073 μm (P < 0.001). The Sof‑Lex Spiral polishing system
revealed significantly the lowest mean surface roughness (Ra) of 0.2734 ± 0.0903 μm (P = 0.004).
Regardless of composite type and polishing system, there was a statistically significant increase
in mean surface roughness values (Ra) in μm after thermocycling (0.2251 ± 0.0496 μm and
0.3506 ± 0.0868 μm, respectively) (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Resin composite type, polishing method, and thermocycling aging significantly affected
the surface roughness of composites; Nanofill composite and Sof‑Lex Spiral polishing system
provided the lowest values of surface roughness which increased after thermocycling.
Key Words: Composite resins, dental polishing, surface properties, thermocycling