This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Plant compounds such as Aloe vera, green tea, and chamomile have been increasingly used in recent years to achieve oral health. This study aimed to determine the antimicrobial effect of chamomile (Matrika), A. vera-green tea, and chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwashes on some oral bacterial species.
This prospective experimental study investigated the antimicrobial properties of three mouthwashes, including chamomile (Matrika), A. vera -green tea, and CHX as well as distilled water as control on five bacterial species, including Streptococcus Oralis, Streptococcus sanguis, and Streptococcus mutans as primary colonizers and Porphyromonas gingivalis and Eikenella corrodens as secondary colonizers. Colony-forming unit was used to count the colonies and disc diffusion and well diffusion methods were used to measure the diameter of zone of inhibition. Data were analyzed by SPSS (version 22) software using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann–Whitney tests (α = 0.05).
CHX had a significantly higher antibacterial effect than the other two mouthwashes in all three methods (P < 0.001). Further, the herbal mouthwashes in all three methods had a statistically significant effect on the bacterial species (P < 0.001). A. vera-green tea mouthwash had a significantly higher effect than chamomile mouthwash (Matrika) on all bacterial species except for S. sanguis (P < 0.05).
The findings showed that herbal mouthwashes had potentially antibacterial effects, but these effects were significantly lower than that of CHX. However, more clinical studies are needed to prove the current findings.
Gingivitis associated with dental plaque is the most common form of gingival disease that leads to destruction of periodontal structure or periodontitis if it is not treated.
Effective prevention of oral infections is accomplished by mechanical removal of dental plaque via toothbrushing and dental flossing.
Aloe vera is a member of Aloaceae family
Numerous studies on animal models have shown that green tea has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antidiabetic, and most importantly anticancer properties.
Several studies have been done on the herbal products. Abdelmonem et al. observed that the number of bacterial colonies of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Prevotella intermedia significantly decreased in the group receiving A. vera mouthwash following SRP treatment.
Considering the abovementioned studies and presence of antibacterial agents in A. vera, green tea, and chamomile plant extracts, the current study was conducted to determine and compare the antimicrobial effects of chamomile (Matrika), A. vera-green tea, and CHX mouthwashes on S. sanguis, S. oralis, S. mutans, P. gingivalis, and Eikenella corrodens bacterial species.
This prospective single-blind in vitro study investigated the antibacterial effects of Matrika (Barij Essence, Kashan, Iran), A. vera-green tea (Barij Essence, Kashan, Iran), and CHX 0.2% (Vi-One, Iran) as well as distilled water as control on five bacterial species, including S. oralis, S. sanguis, and S. mutans as primary colonizers and P. gingivalis and E. corrodens as secondary colonizers at the Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, in 2016.
First, some of the suspension containing each bacterium was cultured on the specific culture medium of each species. After incubation, several colonies of each species were separately dissolved in the Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB, BD™, Germany), and a suspension with specific McFarland turbidity was prepared.
In colony-forming unit, 1 cc of each mouthwash and distilled water was separately mixed with 1 cc of the McFarland bacterial suspension and was cultured in a specific culture medium after incubation. Further, the McFarland suspension of each bacterium was cultured on the specific culture medium prior to adjacency. Finally, the number of colonies was counted before and after adjacency.
To analyze the zone of inhibition by disc diffusion method, the McFarland suspension of each bacterial species was cultured on the specific culture medium plate by spread plate technique. Then, the paper discs impregnated with mouthwash or distilled water (20 μL) were placed on the plate and incubated. Finally, the zone of inhibition of each disc was measured.
As for the analysis of zone of inhibition by well diffusion method, the McFarland suspension of each bacterial species was cultured on the specific culture medium plate by spread plate technique. Then, the wells were created on the culture medium and 60 μL of each mouthwash or distilled water was added to the wells and incubated. Finally, the zone of inhibition of each well was measured.
To increase the accuracy of each sample in disc diffusion and well diffusion methods, 15 tests were carried out on each bacterial species. Moreover, five tests were performed for each sample in each bacterial species in colony-forming unit. The obtained data were analyzed by SPSS (version 22, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) using descriptive statistics and ANOVA, Tukey, Kruskal–Wallis, and Mann–Whitney tests (α = 0.05).
The results of ANOVA showed a significant difference among all the four groups in well diffusion and disc diffusion methods with respect to the mean diameter of zone of inhibition (P < 0.001). Further, the mean diameter of zone of inhibition was significantly different among different bacteria in all three mouthwashes (P < 0.001)
The findings of Kruskal–Wallis test indicated a significant difference among the four groups in the mean number of the remaining bacterial colonies (P < 0.001). Moreover, there was a significant difference among different bacteria in the number of bacterial colonies in both A. vera-green tea and chamomile (Matrika) mouthwashes (P < 0.001). However, there were no colonies in any of the bacteria in CHX mouthwash
The results of this study showed that CHX (which is known as the gold standard antibacterial mouthwash) had a significantly higher effect on all five bacterial species than the other two mouthwashes. Further, each mouthwash had a different effect on various bacterial species.
Regarding the comparison of zone of inhibition by disc diffusion and well diffusion methods, the findings indicated no significant difference for the effect of CHX in both methods for each bacterial species except E. corrodens. As for herbal mouthwashes in disc diffusion method, no zone of inhibition was observed in most bacterial species and the diameter of zone of inhibition was small. Moreover, the diameter of the zone of inhibition induced by the herbal mouthwashes was higher in well diffusion method than disc diffusion method, and a greater number of bacterial species had no zone of inhibition. The amount of the mouthwash used was higher in well diffusion method than disc diffusion method, but given the similar diameters of the zone of inhibition in each bacterial species in both methods, the difference in CHX mouthwash might probably be due to the difference in the inherent diffusion properties of mouthwashes. It seems that the herbal mouthwashes have not been able to diffuse well from the disc to the culture medium after impregnation of discs in disc diffusion method. In well diffusion method, considering the absence of disc and higher amount of the mouthwash used, the zone of inhibition was formed in a greater number of bacterial species. Moreover, the diameter of the zone of inhibition was larger. Saliem investigated the antibacterial effect of the green tea extract, obtained by alcohol and water, and CHX on P. gingivalis using well diffusion and serial microdilution methods and measured the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum bactericidal concentration. The researcher concluded that ethanolic green tea was more effective than CHX and water-based green tea.
The present study showed that CHX mouthwash had the lowest effect on S. mutans in both disc diffusion and well diffusion methods, while its effect was equal on all bacterial species in colony-forming unit, and the number of colonies after adjacency with the mouthwash was equal to 0. Research has shown that CHX has a high capacity in reducing the dental plaque and pathogenic microorganisms like S. mutans among all mouthwashes available,
In this study, the effect of A. vera-green tea mouthwash on S. mutans, P. gingivalis, and E. corrodens was higher than that of Matrika mouthwash in all three methods. However, its effect on S. sanguis was lower than that of Matrika in all three methods, but it showed a significant difference compared to the control group (distilled water). Further, the effect of this mouthwash on Streptococcus oralis was higher than that of Matrika mouthwash in colony-forming unit and well diffusion method.
Sakanaka et al. showed that green tea catechin had inhibitory effects on S. mutans. However, the efficacy of green tea and CHX was not compared in this study.
Hirasawa et al. indicated that green tea catechin had bactericidal effects on the black pigment bacteria and Gram-negative anaerobic rods, and a combination of mechanical methods and green tea catechin improved the periodontal conditions.
Using microdilution and disc diffusion methods, Fani and Kohantalab found that A. vera gel had inhibitory effects on some caries-inducing and periopathogenic bacteria. They concluded that a proper concentration of A. vera gel could be used in toothpaste or mouthwash to prevent caries and periodontal diseases.
Sadeghi reported a significantly higher effect of CHX on S. mutans, S. sanguis, and E. corrodens than chamomile mouthwash using disc diffusion method.
In the present study, CHX mouthwash exhibited a significantly higher effect than Matrika on all five bacterial species in all methods. Moreover, Matrika mouthwash showed a significant effect on S. mutans, S. sanguis, and P. gingivalis in colony-forming unit but had no effect on E. corrodens and S. oralis. In addition, Matrika had the highest effect on S. sanguis. Since this bacterium is similar to S. mutans and Gram-positive S. oralis cocci, this difference might be due to the inherent properties of the bacterial species.
The findings of Hashemipour et al. also showed that CHX had a higher effect than chamomile on Lactobacillus casei, C. albicans, S. sanguis, S. viridans, and S. mutans in serial dilution method,
A limitation of this study was lack of access to other species like periopathogens. Moreover, the mouthwashes used in this study were made beforehand and it was not possible to change their concentration. In addition, given the different growth conditions of oral bacterial species compared to in vitro conditions, further clinical studies are suggested to explore the effect of herbal mouthwashes. Furthermore, the adjacency of plant compounds and microorganisms is suggested to be taken into account in analyzing the antimicrobial effects of plant compounds.
The findings of the present study showed that A. vera-green tea and Matrika mouthwashes had potentially antibacterial effects, but these effects were lower than that of CHX mouthwash. Within the limitations of this study, it seems that these herbal mouthwashes cannot be an appropriate substitute to CHX mouthwash. However, more clinical studies are needed to prove the present findings.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank all of participants who help us to conducting this study. Based on a thesis submitted to the school of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the DDS/MSC degree, this study was supported by Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Research (Grant No. 396279).
Financial support and sponsorship
This study has been supported by the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial in this article.