?
DRJDent Res JDental Research JournalDental Research Journal
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Background:
The aim of the present study was to compare dental indexes of pediatric Down syndrome (DS) patients to those who are healthy.
Materials and Methods:
This study was carried out based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement guidelines. The researchers searched title and abstract of major databases, including ProQuest (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text: Health and Medicine, ProQuest Nursing and Allie Health Source), PubMed, Google Scholar, clinical key, up to date, springer, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (ISI), up to September 2020 with restriction to English and Persian language This meta-analysis study had three outcomes: decay/miss/filled index, plaque index, and gingival index. Effect size, including mean difference and its 95% of confidence interval, was calculated. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale measured the quality of the selected studies. Heterogeneity was performed using the Q test and I
2index, and reporting bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Egger and Begg's tests.
Results:
Fifteen studies conducted were included in the meta-analysis process.
Conclusion:
It showed that DS patients had a higher plaque index and gingival index than healthy individuals, which means that the oral health status of these patients is worse and needs more attention.
Decayedmissing and filled teethDown syndromegingival indexoral healthplaque indexIntroduction
Down syndrome (DS) is the most prevalent chromosomal abnormality that affects many organs, including the oral area. Hence, oral, dental, and gingival disorders are some of the most critical problems in DS patients.
1The most important causes of these problems in DS patients include immune system deficiency and dry mouth, which are usually caused by mouth breathing and taking some medications (anticonvulsant and sedative),
2slotted lips and tongue,
3and constant opening of the mouth due to an imbalance in the strength of its muscles. Furthermore, some food stays in the mouth of these patients due to the low tone in their muscles.
4
In some studies, there are pieces of evidence of the higher frequency of periodontal diseases and oral disorders in DS patients than in healthy individuals.
5,
6,
7Furthermore, a meta-analysis study was conducted in 2015 to examine the association of tooth decay with DS. This meta-analysis analyzed eight studies and concluded that teeth caries in DS patients were more prevalent than the healthy individuals.
8However, this study only examined the status of tooth decay in DS and did not evaluate other dental indices. Furthermore, a systematic review study was conducted in 2016 and provided evidence of a higher incidence of tooth decay in DS patients.
9
Patients with DS are prone to oral and dental diseases in comparison to healthy population. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to compare dental indexes of pediatric patients with DS to those who are healthy.
Due to the differences in the types of oral diseases, there are different indices to assess the status of oral diseases, including decay/miss/filled (DMF), plaque index, and gingival index. Some primary studies assessed these indices in DS patients, but there is no meta-analysis study in this area. This gap was addressed in this meta-analysis study.
Materials and Methods
Eligibility criteria
We carried out this study based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement guidelines. Based on the PECO model, the study was designed as follows: (patients): people with DS (exposure to risk factor): DS (comparison): oral health indicators in people with DS with healthy people (outcome): dental problems, decay, missed and filled teeth (DMFT), periodontal problems.
Three outcomes in this study included: (1) DMF, which defined the number of DMFT and used for 65 years in dentistry,
10(2) plaque index, which is the amount of visible dental plaque on the lingual surfaces of all teeth,
11and (3) gingival index which is a method to assessing the severity and quantity of gingivitis scores each site on a 0–3 scale, with 0 being normal and 3 being severe inflammation.
12All cross-sectional or case-control studies that evaluate these indices in DS patients and healthy control were included irrespective of nationality, race, and publication day. Only the studies in English and Persian language were included in the study.
Inclusion criteria
Observational studies (case reports, cohort, and cross-sectional studies) evaluating the prevalence, incidence, or experience of oral and dental diseases in patients with DS (without age limitation) compared to healthy patients that have reported the results in percentage were selected. Moreover, only articles written in Farsi and English that their abstracts and full texts were available were included in the present study. Articles published in valid journals were selected. Furthermore, dissertations evaluating the abovementioned topic were considered.
Exclusion criteria
Articles written in languages other than Farsi and English as well as those evaluating oral and dental diseases in patients without DS were excluded from the present study. Besides, studies with nonconformity regarding P and O were not evaluated. Furthermore, studies scored <5 after checking the related checklist were excluded from the study. Finally, studies that did not report the outcomes in percentage were not included in the study.
Search strategy
Three authors searched title and abstract of major databases, including ProQuest (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Full Text: Health and Medicine, ProQuest Nursing and Allie Health Source), PubMed, Google Scholar, Clinical Key, Up to Date, Springer, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (ISI), up to September 2020 with restriction to English and Persian language. The following search terms used for all databases: ((Down * AND syndrome) OR Mongolism OR “Trisomy 21” OR “47, XY, +21” OR “47, XX, +21” OR “Trisomy G” OR “partial trisomy 21” OR (mitotic AND nondisjunction)) AND (DMFT OR dmft OR “Decayed Missed Filled Teeth” OR ((Dent * OR tooth OR teeth OR oral) AND (Caries OR decay * OR Plaque Index * OR Plaque Indices OR periodontal disease * OR Hygiene Index * OR Hygiene Indices OR Health OR Clinics OR Health Surveys OR Diagnosis)) OR ((Periodontal OR gingival OR mouth OR calculus) AND (Disease * OR Index * OR Indices OR rehabilitation)) OR “Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs” OR CPITN OR “Gingival Bleeding on Probing” OR “Pyorrhea Alveolaris” OR Parodontos * s).
Study selection and data extraction
Search results were imported to EndNote software, and duplicate studies were removed. Then two authors (H. P. and N. M.) screened the title and abstract independently and were removed from irrelevant studies – disagreement between the two authors was solved by discussion with the third author (F. N.). Then, the full text of the most relevant studies was retrieved and screened by two authors. The data from selected studies were extracted and imported to electronic form. These data include the author's name, title, publication year, study design and method, characteristics of participants, age, sample size, statistical analysis, and prominent result. Furthermore, the effect size, including mean difference and 95% confidence interval (CI), comprehensive meta-analysis software for data analysis in this study was applied.
Methodological quality
The quality of the selected studies was measured by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
13and by two authors. According to this protocol, the following criteria were examined: (1) accuracy of selection of study group (diagnosis of DS based on genetic testing or patients selecting from referral centers and control individuals without any disorders), (2) control of confounders such as drug use and socioeconomic status, and (3) outcome assessment (assessing the dental disorders by an experienced researcher and calibrated tools, existence of clinical criteria for the mentioned disorders, assessing of controls, and reporting of nonresponse cases). For each study, a score of 0–8 was assigned based on these scales and was recorded in electronic form. Finally, the scores of the studies were collected and classified as high quality (score 6–8), medium quality (score 3–5), and low quality (score 0–2).
Reporting bias and heterogeneity
Heterogeneity was performed using the Q test and I
2index.
14,
15In the case of studies with heterogeneity, we used of random effect model to combine the results. Reporting bias was assessed using funnel plots and Begg tests.
16
Results
Search results and quality assessment
We identified 617 comparative studies through a systematic search. Two hundred and fifty-six studies were excluded before the assessing, and 361 studies were screened. In this step, 317 studies were removed after screening the title and abstract. Finally, 15 studies conducted between 2005 and 2020 were included in the meta-analysis process
Figure 1.
Study selecting flowchart.
Figure 1
The total sample size was 1200 in the DS patients and 1235 in the healthy individuals. The mean age was 13.93 ± 9.52 years. Nine studies (60%) in Asia, 4 (26.67%) in South America, and 1 study from Europe and North America were included in the meta-analysis. Characteristics and information of selected studies are presented in
Table 1.{Table 1}
Five studies had a score ≥6 (high quality), and 10 studies had a score of <6 (low quality) out of 15 studies included for meta-analysis. Details of the quality assessment results of the articles submitted for meta-analysis are presented in
Table 2.{Table 2}
Synthesis of studies
The mean of DMF index in DS patients was lower than in healthy individuals that were not significant (Hedges' g = −0.28, 95% CI = −0.69–0.13, P = 0.18). Heterogeneity was reported by I
2= 94.52%
Figure 2. The mean plaque index in DS patients was significantly higher than in healthy individuals (Hedges' g = 2.39, 95% CI = 0.38–4.40, P = 0.02). Heterogeneity was reported by I
2= 98.21%
Figure 3. The mean gingival index in DS patients was significantly higher than in healthy individuals (Hedges' g = 2.75, 95% CI = 0.71–4.79, P = 0.01). Heterogeneity was reported by I
2= 98.81%
Figure 4.
The effect of Down syndrome on decay/miss/filled. SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 2
The effect of Down syndrome on plaque index. SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 3
The effect of Down syndrome on gingival index. SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 4
Subgroup analysis
The analysis of the DMF means that difference by continent was possible. These results showed that the mean DMF index in DS patients was lower than in healthy individuals in Asian countries that were not significant (Hedges' g = −0.33, 95% CI = −0.83, P = 0.18) and also in South American countries, this finding was similarly observed (Hedges' g = −0.15, 95% CI − 0.40, P = 0.10)
Figure 5.
The effect of Down syndrome on decay/miss/filled by continent. SD: Standard deviation, CI: Confidence interval.
Figure 5
Publication bias
There was no evidence of publication bias based on Begg's test. The P value of this test in studies that assessed the effect of DS on DMF, plaque, and gingival index were 0.901, 0.0303, and 0.300, respectively. Hence, there was no evidence of publication bias in studies.
Discussion
The present study showed that the mean DMFT in DS patients was slightly lower than the healthy individuals, which were not significant. Heterogeneity in this finding was above 90%.
There have been various studies on the association between DS and some dental indicators, and some studies showed that DS had no effect on the DMF index and even reduced it in line with our study.
17,
18,
19In a study by Teng et al.,
20the oral health of hospitalized patients was lower than the general population and was ignored by the patients themselves. In a study by Kebede et al.,
21the gingival index was also affected by psychiatric disorders.In a study by AlSarheed,
22there was no significant difference in caries incidence between children with and without DS. DS may involve the salivary glands. As a result, the salivary environment may produce a different electrolyte, which reduces caries in children with DS.
2Al Habashneh et al.
5concluded a similar level of caries in the two groups with and without DS. However, the adolescents with DS had more dental malformations and poor periodontal health than primary school children of the same age and gender. In a meta-analysis study by Deps et al.,
8DS patients also had less tooth decay than individuals without it. There are several factors in studies to explain the lower rate of caries in DS patients. One of the most common causes is related to oral features in the face of DS patients.
23Dental malformations are up to 10 times more prevalent in DS patients than in healthy populations. These malformations include microdontia, diastema, agenesis, delayed eruption, tooth morphology, and the increased prevalence of gritted teeth.
24Diastema is prevalent in DS patients due to microdontia and agenesis. Hence, the prevalence of proximal caries lesions is significantly reduced due to many diastema presents.
25Theoretically, short-distance teeth with delayed tooth eruption reduce the food stagnation between teeth and smooth surfaces for the presence and establishment of caries bacteria.
26Furthermore, some studies suggested that low caries experience in DS patients is due to saliva composition (saliva pH and higher bicarbonate levels) and differences in microbiota composition (number of Streptococcus mutants).
27In addition, studies reported that changes in the oral ecosystem in DS patients can lead to physiological changes in the flow and composition of saliva.
28In general, according to these contents, the results of the present study and previous studies are consistent with each other and confirmed the findings of this study.
In the present study, it was found that the mean plaque index was significantly higher in DS patients than in healthy individuals. The 95% CI was from 0.38 to 4.6, which means that the average plaque index in DS patients is higher up to 4.6 than in healthy individuals. Furthermore, the results showed that the mean of a gingival index in DS patients was significantly 2.75 more than in healthy individuals. In some studies, similar results approved our findings.
2,
28,
29,
30
Conclusion
Based on the result of the present research, it showed that DS patients had a higher plaque index and gingival index than in healthy individuals, which means that the oral health status of these patients is worse and needs more attention. According to the present study results, it is recommended that oral health status and plaque and gingival indices in DS patients be regularly monitored to prevent severe oral disorders and additional costs.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.
RajputSKumarAPuranikMPSowmyaKROral health inequalities between differently abled and healthy school children in Bengaluru—A cross-sectional study.Special Care in Dentistry5561DavidovichEAframianDJShapiraJPeretzBA comparison of the sialochemistry, oral pH, and oral health status of Down syndrome children to healthy children23541BachtiarZASalmiahSClarisaEComparison of Caries Status and Saliva Condition (pH, Buffer Capacity, Flow Rate, and Volume) among Down Syndrome and Normal Children aged 6-18 Years Old in SLB C Medan Helvetia and Medan Timur District.InInternational Dental Conference of Sumatera Utara 2017 (IDCSU 2017) 2018 Feb (ppComparison of Caries Status and Saliva Condition (pH, Buffer Capacity, Flow Rate, and Volume) among Down Syndrome and Normal Children aged 6-18 Years Old in SLB C Medan Helvetia and Medan Timur District InInternational Dental Conference of Sumatera Utara 2017 (IDCSU 2017) 2018 Feb (pp 341-346) Atlantis PressGhaithBAl HalabiMKhamisAHKowashMOral health status among children with Down syndrome in Dubai, United Arab Emirates.Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry232Al HabashnehRAl-JundiSKhaderYNofelNOral health status and reasons for not attending dental care among 12- to 16-year-old children with Down syndrome in special needs centres in Jordan25964GhaithBB KowashMEl-HalabiMMedical and Dental Implications of Down Syndrome: A Review Part 1: General and Craniofacial Characteristic.Applied Clinical Research, Clinical Trials and Regulatory Affairs1518HashizumeLNSchwertnerCMoreiraMJCoitinhoASFacciniLSSalivary secretory IgA concentration and dental caries in children with Down syndrome.Special care in dentistry1159MathiasFAreiasCSampaio-MaiaBPereiraMDAzevedoAMeloPAndradeCScullyCReduced salivary flow and colonization by mutans streptococci in children with Down syndrome.Clinics100711SubramaniamPGirish BabuKLMohan DasLAssessment of salivary total antioxidant levels and oral health status in children with Down syndrome.Special Care in Dentistry193200AndreevaRAtanasovaSPrevalence of periodontal diseases in children with Down syndrome.Journal of IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers33836FigueiredoLCFeresMSalvadorSLHalitosis and periodontal disease in subjects with mental disabilities.Oral Diseases835KomatsuTDuckyoungYItoAKurosawaKMaehataYKuboderaTIkedaMIncreased oxidative stress biomarkers in the saliva of Down syndrome patients.Archives of Oral Biology124650WellsGSheaBO'ConnellDPetersonJWelchVLososMTugwellPNewcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale cohort studies.University of OttawaNewcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale cohort studies University of Ottawa 2014AlSarheedMA comparative study of oral health amongst trisomy 21 children living in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Part 1 caries, malocclusion, trauma.The Saudi Dental Journal2203Huedo-MedinaTBSánchez-MecaJMarín-MartínezFBotellaJAssessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?193206LinLChuHQuantifying publication bias in meta-analysis78594CostacurtaMEpisMDocimoREvaluation of DMFT in paediatric patients with social vulnerability conditions703KamalabadiYMSedighSSAbbaslouMThe relationship between DMFT index and cognitive impairment: A descriptive cross-sectional study431722Pontigo-LoyolaAPMárquez-CoronaMLMinaya-SánchezMLucas-RincónSECasanova-RosadoJFRobles-MinayaJLCorrelation between the caries status of the first permanent molars and the overall DMFT index: A cross-sectional studye19061TengPRSuJMChangWHLaiTJOral health of psychiatric inpatients: A survey of central Taiwan hospitals2539KebedeBKemalTAberaSOral health status of patients with mental disorders in Southwest Ethiopiae39142AlSarheedMA comparative study of oral health amongst trisomy 21 children living in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: Part 1 caries, malocclusion, trauma2203LabarrereCAWoodsJRHardinJWCampanaGLOrtizMAJaegerBREarly prediction of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and heart transplant failure52835HennequinMAllisonPJVeyruneJLPrevalence of oral health problems in a group of individuals with Down syndrome in France6918DesaiSSFlanaganTJOrthodontic considerations in individuals with Down syndrome: A case report858AreiasCSampaio-MaiaBPereira MdeLAzevedoAMeloPAndradeCReduced salivary flow and colonization by Mutans streptococci in children with Down syndrome100711de CastilhoARPardiVPereiraCVDental caries experience in relation to salivary findings and molecular identification of S.mutans and SDental caries experience in relation to salivary findings and molecular identification of S mutans and S sobrinus in subjects with Down syndrome Odontology 2011;99:162-7MorinushiTLopatinDENakaoRKinjyoSA comparison of the gingival health of children with Down syndrome to healthy children residing in an institution139KhochtARussellBCannonJGTurnerBJanalMOxidative burst intensity of peripheral phagocytic cells and periodontitis in Down syndrome2935MoreiraMJSchwertnerCGrandoDFacciniLSHashizumeLNOral health status and salivary levels of Mutans streptococci in children with Down syndrome35560