Peri-implantitis is implant-associated inflammation that leads to irreversible loss of surrounding bone. Early diagnosis increases the success of peri-implantitis treatment. Despite various studies associated with this most common complication, early detection of the onset of peri-implantitis remains a major challenge. Molecular biomarkers are applicable detectors for the early detection of numerous diseases and monitoring their development. The present study aimed to predict interactome networks of up/down regulated proteins and analyze drug-gene interaction in peri-implantitis to identify the diagnostic and druggable genes.
Materials and Methods:
In this in silico study, a suitable gene expression profile related to peri-implantitis was retrieved from Gene Expression Omnibus. Screening differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was carried out based on the cut-off criteria |log2 (fold change)|>2 and P < 0.05. Interactome networks were constructed and analyzed by the STRING database (Version: 12.0) and the Cytoscape software (version: 3.9.1). Finally, to investigate drug-gene interaction, detected hub genes were analyzed by DGIdb (version: 5.0.6).
Results:
A total of 216 genes were identified as DEGs (129 down-regulated and 87 up-regulated genes) in peri-implantitis. Regarding Cytoscape analysis, FCGR3B, CSF3R, AQP9, TREM1, and P2RY13 were the top 5 hub nodes of up-regulated DEGs, and CXCL10, OASL, IFIT1, RSAD2, and ISG15 were the top 5 hub nodes of down-regulated DEGs. Among these key nods, AQP9, CSF3R, CXCL10, IFIT1, ISG15, OASL, and, FCGR3B were therapeutic targets and had approved drugs.
Conclusion:
In this research, seven genes have been identified as druggable genes in peri-implantitis which can be used to treat and diagnose this disease. However, these results and identified genes need to be validated by clinical or experimental methods.
In modern comprehensive dental care, dental implant treatment is one of the best solutions for missing teeth.[1] Due to the increase in dental implant therapy, the biological complications and diseases related to implants have significantly increased. The soft and hard tissues around dental implants are impacted by the damaging inflammatory process known as peri-implantitis. With the progress of inflammation, the hard tissue (alveolar bone), which surrounds the implant for retention, gradually disappears. Bacterial biofilm proliferating plays a major role in the progress of this disease. Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria are the most common microorganisms in the environment of implants. Bacterial colonization occurs in the transmucosal attachment of osseointegrated dental implants. Titanium plays a pivotal role in implant material. Laboratory studies show the high affinity of several microorganisms to the titanium surface. To solve this problem, nanomaterials are used to cover titanium. Dental nanomaterials such as chlorhexidine, zinc oxide, hydroxyapatite, copper-oxide, and other metal oxide nanoparticles are used for titanium-based dental implant coatings to provide antimicrobial function and better integration of the implants into the bone. However, peri-implantitis remains one of the problems of implant treatment failure.[2-7]
Genetic traits, history of periodontitis, smoking, systemic diseases, and oral hygiene are the risk factors for this type of infection.[4,8] Based on the progression of the disease and peri-implant defects, peri-implantitis is classified as early, moderate, and advanced stage.[9] Diagnosis of peri-implant diseases is based on analyses of peri-implant microbiota, clinical parameters such as the presence of swelling and suppuration, evaluation of peri-implant crevicular fluid or saliva, and radiographic examination of peri-implant bone loss. In this disease, untreated lesions and inflammatory processes can lead to progressive loss of peri-implant bone and implant failure. Early detection of infection, monitoring the course of inflammation, and rapid initiation of treatment are very effective for the successful treatment of peri-implantitis, which is possible through the assessment of biomarkers.[10-12]
Interactome networks are remarkably complex and diverse and play an important role in every biological process. By identifying up/down proteins and constructing protein-protein interactions, prediction of biomarkers in various diseases is possible. In recent years, biomarkers or biological markers have become increasingly important for efficient disease diagnosis, target discovery, study of drug activity and mechanisms of action, identification of toxicity and safety, assessment of efficacy signals, and understanding of disease processes.[13-15] In this research, artificial neural networks were used to detect new biological markers and drug-biomarker interaction in peri-implantitis.
Many studies have been done on peri-implantitis patients, in this field. A significant increase in levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha, and IL-6 was reported in peri-implantitis patients compared to individuals with healthy implants.[16] The levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG), and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL) were shown to be significantly higher in peri-implantitis. Even upregulation of some enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinases, cathepsin K, and elastase have been mentioned as diagnostic biomarkers. Overactivity of these enzymes is associated with irreversible destruction of the connective tissue around the implant.[17] In addition, miRNA-142-3p and miRNA-146a were reported as potential biomarkers in the meta-analysis study on the expression of microRNAs in periodontal and peri-implant diseases.[18]
Despite numerous studies associated with identifying biomarkers of peri-implantitis, early detection of the onset of peri-implantitis remains a major challenge, and more exploratory research is needed to identify the specific biomarkers. The present study aimed to predict interactome networks of up/down regulated proteins and analyze drug-gene interaction in peri-implantitis. We used microarray data of peri-implantitis patients to detect the up-regulated and down-regulated proteins. Furthermore, we constructed protein-protein interaction networks and identified candidate hub genes as biomarkers. Finally, to find potential drug targets, a drug-gene interaction database (DGIdb) was used and drug hub genes for therapeutic targets in peri-implantitis were discovered.
MATERIALS AND METHODSMicroarray data selection for peri-implantitis
This research was done by in silico methods. The gene expression omnibus (GEO) database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gds) is one of the largest and most comprehensive web-based tools for the screening and analysis of various microarray data.[19] Extracted data from the GEO database are very applicable and useful in designing different interactome networks such as protein-protein interaction networks, gene regulation networks, microRNA-mRNA regulatory networks, etc. Based on the latest publication dates, the suitable microarray gene expression data set of peri-implantitis in homosapiens was selected from the GEO database.
Data processing and screening strategy
By the R language in GEO2R, up-regulated and down-regulated genes were filtered. In this tool, two groups peri-implantitis and healthy individuals were defined and then, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs)’ filtration was carried out based on the cut-off criteria |log2 (fold change)|>2 and P < 0.05 were obtained.
Construction of protein-protein interaction network
STRING is a free computational database for investigating all kinds of physical and functional interactions between various proteins.[20] In this section, down-regulated DEGs and up-regulated DEGs were inputted into the search tool of STRING Version: 12.0 (Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics), separately. After hiding disconnected nodes in the created file, the remaining genes were saved in TSV format. The TSV output file contains the needed information on the protein-protein interaction network consisting of all nodes and all interactions between them. The Cytoscape software is a useful viewer for visualizing the protein-protein interaction network created by STRING. In the next step, Cytoscape v3.9.1 was used and two protein-protein interaction networks were constructed and visualized.
Hub genes detection and drug-gene interaction analysis
CytoHubba is a helpful application in the menu bar of Cytoscape software that predicts and explores important nodes. CytoHubba plugin in Cytoscape v3.9.1 software (Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington) was used for detecting the top 5 hub genes in each network. The screening of nods is based on degree, maximum neighborhood component, and other topological analysis parameters. The DGIdb shows interactions based on different valid sources. To investigate drug interactions with hub genes, 10 hub genes (up-regulated and down-regulated) were inserted into DGIdb v.5.0.6 at https://www.dgidb.org/.
RESULTSMicroarray data selection for peri-implantitis
Gene expression profile of peri-implantitis with accession number: GSE224044 (Public on Feb 01, 2024) was selected for further analysis. This microarray profile consists of two types of tissues, peri-implantitis samples, and healthy samples as control. This dataset was based on GPL16791 Illumina HiSeq 2500. In the GSE224044 dataset, there are 6 profiles. GSM7010225, GSM7496778, and GSM7010226 were peri-implantitis inflammatory tissues. GSM7010227, GSM7010228, and GSM7496777 were as healthy gingival tissues.
Data processing and screening strategy
After data processing by the R language in GEO2R, 129 DEGs were analyzed as down-regulated mRNAs, and 87 DEGs were analyzed as up-regulated mRNAs. The volcano plot and normalization plot of DEGs in the GSE224044 dataset are shown in Figure 1.
The volcano plot (a) and normalization plot (b) of differentially expressed genes in the GSE224044 dataset.
Construction of protein-protein interaction network
Protein interactomes help to identify key genes and main modules involved in the development and progression of peri-implantitis. Protein-protein interaction network of down-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs of GSE224044 by Cytoscape software was shown, with 19 nods and 43 edges. But about up-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs, 15 nods and 23 edges were detected [Figures 2 and 3].
Protein-protein interaction network analysis of down-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs. This figure was created by cytoscape software (3.9.1).
Protein-protein interaction network analysis of up-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs. This figure was created by cytoscape software (3.9.1).
Hub genes detection and drug-gene interaction analysis
Based on CytoHubba plugin results, FCGR3B, CSF3R, AQP9, TREM1, and P2RY13 are the top 5 hub genes of up-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs. CXCL10, OASL, IFIT1, RSAD2, and ISG15 are the top 5 hub genes of down-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs [Figure 4]. Based on the results of the DGIdb 3.0 database, the approved drugs related to hub genes with interaction scores were introduced [Table 1].
The top 5 hub genes of up-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs (a) and down-regulated differentially expressed mRNAs (b).
The approved drugs related to hub genes based on the drug-gene interaction database 3.0 database
DISCUSSION
Peri-implantitis is a common problem in dental implant treatment and a major cause of dental implant loss. Inflammatory conditions and the presence of harmful microorganisms cause this site-specific infectious disease.[21,22] However, even with current diagnostic criteria, identifying the precise underlying cause and detecting the early stages of peri-implantitis remains challenging. Determination of disease status or response to therapy is a common use of molecular biomarkers in medicine.[23] In previous studies, we worked on the use of bioinformatics methods in drug identification and vaccine design for various diseases.[24-27] The objective of the present investigation was to predict potential key biomarkers associated with peri-implantitis by constructing interactome networks of up/down regulated proteins and drug-gene interaction analysis. Eighty-seven upregulated DEGs and 129 downregulated DEGs were successfully identified when comparing the gene expression matrix of peri-implantitis, and healthy samples. After further analysis of detected genes, 10 hub genes (5 up-regulated genes: FCGR3B, CSF3R, AQP9, TREM1, and P2RY13 and 5 down-regulated genes: CXCL10, OASL, IFIT1, RSAD2, and ISG15) were identified that may play a crucial role in the occurrence and development of peri-implantitis. Most of the obtained hub genes were consistent with previous peri-implantitis biomarker studies.
In this study results, Fc gamma receptor IIIb (FCGR3B) also known as cluster of differentiation 16b was identified as one of the hub genes involved in peri-implantitis. In a study conducted by Saremi et al., to evaluate the relationship between Fc gamma-receptor gene polymorphisms and peri-implantitis 50 cases of this disease were studied. Based on the results of their study, a significant association between FCGR3B and peri-implantitis was proven.[28] Suzuki et al., analyzed 3 microarray gene expression data sets (GSE10334, GSE16134, and GSE23586) to identify molecular biomarker candidates for the diagnosis and prognosis of chronic periodontitis. Based on their results, the gene FCGR3B was introduced as a key gene along with other genes.[29] The presence of the CSF3R gene in the protein network obtained based on the analysis of the GSE33774 microarray dataset was confirmed.[30] Aquaporin-9 (AQP-9) is an integral membrane protein that facilitates water transport. This hydrophobic membrane protein plays important roles in tissue homeostasis, the specialized functions of leukocytes such as immune response and activity against bacteria. Studies have described the involvement of AQPs in pathological conditions in various organs. In the study by Buffoli et al., tissue samples from six patients, comprising paired peri-implant soft tissue and periodontal gingiva tissue, were procured to analyze DEGs. In this research, 3549 genes were detected as DEGs among them AQP9, which has been confirmed to exhibit upregulation in the soft tissue surrounding the implant site.[31,32] P2Y purinoceptor 13 with 354 amino acids encoded by the P2RY13 gene belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor. This receptor increases the release of pro-inflammatory factors and is involved in various pathophysiological processes such as apoptosis, autophagy, proliferation, and metabolism. Based on the study of Cai et al., P2RY13 is the common gene signature among 5 key genes in both diseases, obesity and periodontitis.[33]
The DGIdb database was employed to investigate the interactions between hub genes and related potential therapeutic drugs. This platform facilitates precise medical diagnosis and drug discovery. According to the results of this DGIdb, 7 genes among 10 hub genes were druggable and had approved drugs. Forty-nine potential drugs/compounds for peri-implantitis treatment were detected. Among them, 4 targeted drugs for AQP9, 12 targeted drugs for CSF3R, 11 targeted drugs for CXCL10, 2 targeted drugs for IFIT1, 1 targeted drug for ISG15, 2 targeted drugs for OASL, and 17 targeted drugs for FCGR3B.
The main difficulty in developing new drugs is identifying target proteins. Detected genes have potential applications beyond pri-implantitis screening. They may offer fresh perspectives on future directions in therapeutic drug development for clinical use. The current research has some limitations, we use available gene expression profiles and in silico approaches for data analysis. However, this study provides new insights into the understanding of genes involved in diagnosing and treating pri-implantitis.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, seven genes, including AQP9, CSF3R, CXCL10, IFIT1, ISG15, OASL, and FCGR3B, have been identified as druggable genes in pri-implantitis, which play a crucial role in the progression and prognosis of this disease. However, due to the lack of in vivo and in vitro validation in this study, our results and identified genes need to be validated by clinical or experimental methods.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial in this article.
REFERENCESBhagawatiSB, JainSR, DebnathP, RiyazK, PatilR, AnsariJ. Patients'perceptions regarding acceptance of dental implants as an option for the replacement of missing teeth:An observational study. Cureus2024;16:e57232.RoccuzzoA, ImberJC, SalviGE, RoccuzzoM. Peri-implantitis as the consequence of errors in implant therapy. Periodontol 20002023;92:350–61.Banu RazaF, VijayaragavaluS, KandasamyR, KrishnaswamiV, KumarVA. Microbiome and the inflammatory pathway in peri-implant health and disease with an updated review on treatment strategies. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res2023;13:84–91.SchwarzF, DerksJ, MonjeA, WangHL. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol2018;45Suppl 20:S246–66.ChenL, TongZ, LuoH, QuY, GuX, SiM. Titanium particles in peri-implantitis:Distribution, pathogenesis and prospects. Int J Oral Sci2023;15:49.ParniaF, YazdaniJ, JavaherzadehV, Maleki DizajS. Overview of nanoparticle coating of dental implants for enhanced osseointegration and antimicrobial purposes. J Pharm Pharm Sci2017;20:148–60.CostaRC, BertoliniM, Costa OliveiraBE, NagayBE, DiniC, BensoB, et al. Polymicrobial biofilms related to dental implant diseases:Unravelling the critical role of extracellular biofilm matrix. Crit Rev Microbiol2023;49:370–90.MamenoT, WadaM, OnoderaY, FujitaD, SatoH, IkebeK. Longitudinal study on risk indicators for peri-implantitis using survival-time analysis. J Prosthodont Res2019;63:216–20.RamanauskaiteA, JuodzbalysG. Diagnostic principles of peri-implantitis:A systematic review and guidelines for peri-implantitis diagnosis proposal. J Oral Maxillofac Res2016;7:e8.BornesR, MonteroJ, CorreiaA, MarquesT, RosaN. Peri-implant diseases diagnosis, prognosis and dental implant monitoring:A narrative review of novel strategies and clinical impact. BMC Oral Health2023;23:183.KwonT, YenHH, LevinL. Peri-implant disease:Early diagnosis and non-surgical treatment –A narrative literature review. Front Oral Maxillofac Med2022;4:38.LeeWF, DayMY, FangCY, NatarajV, WenSC, ChangWJ, et al. Establishing a novel deep learning model for detecting peri-implantitis. J Dent Sci2024;19:1165–73.AhmadA, ImranM, AhsanH. Biomarkers as biomedical bioindicators:Approaches and techniques for the detection, analysis, and validation of novel biomarkers of diseases. Pharmaceutics2023;15:1630.CondratCE, ThompsonDC, BarbuMG, BugnarOL, BobocA, CretoiuD, et al. miRNAs as biomarkers in disease:Latest findings regarding their role in diagnosis and prognosis. Cells2020;9:276.RyszJ, Gluba-BrzózkaA, FranczykB, JabłonowskiZ, Ciałkowska-RyszA. Novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease and the prediction of its outcome. Int J Mol Sci2017;18:1702.GhassibI, ChenZ, ZhuJ, WangHL. Use of IL-1 ?, IL-6, TNF-?, and MMP-8 biomarkers to distinguish peri-implant diseases:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res2019;21:190–207.AlassyH, ParachuruP, WolffL. Peri-implantitis diagnosis and prognosis using biomarkers in peri-implant crevicular fluid:A narrative review. Diagnostics (Basel)2019;9:214.Asa'adF, Garaicoa-PazmiñoC, DahlinC, LarssonL. Expression of MicroRNAs in periodontal and peri-implant diseases:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci2020;21:4147.CloughE, BarrettT. The gene expression omnibus database. Methods Mol Biol2016;1418:93–110.SzklarczykD, GableAL, NastouKC, LyonD, KirschR, PyysaloS, et al. The STRING database in 2021:Customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res2021;49:D605–12.RokayaD, SrimaneepongV, WisitrasameewonW, HumagainM, ThunyakitpisalP. Peri-implantitis update:Risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur J Dent2020;14:672–82.MonjeA, InsuaA, WangHL. Understanding peri-implantitis as a plaque-associated and site-specific entity:On the local predisposing factors. J Clin Med2019;8:279.OuFS, MichielsS, ShyrY, AdjeiAA, ObergAL. Biomarker discovery and validation:Statistical considerations. J Thorac Oncol2021;16:537–45.AsadzadehA, GhorbaniN, DastanK. Identification of druggable hub genes and key pathways associated with cervical cancer by protein-protein interaction analysis:An in silico study. Int J Reprod Biomed2023;21:809–18.Shams Moattar FAsadzadehA, HeydariM, ZamaniM, EsnaashariF, JeldaniF. Designing multi-epitope subunit vaccine candidate for Zika virus utilizing in silico tools. Res Mol Med2022;10:9–18.Naderi KotakiM, AsadzadehA, HeidaryanF. Study the effect of thymus vulgaris in inhibiting acetylcholinesterase enzyme in order to treat Alzheimer's disease. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci2020;27:594–602.MosalanezhadF, AsadzadehA, GhanbariasadA, NaderpoorM, BordbarR, GhavamizadehM, et al. The evaluation of the anti-histone deacetylase, antibacterial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of synthetic N, N´-ethylenebis (? methylsalicylideneiminate) schiff base derivatives. Iran J Chem Chem Eng2022;41:1856–69.SaremiL, EsmaeilzadehE, GhorashiT, SohrabiM, Ekhlasmand KermaniM, KadkhodazadehM. Association of Fc gamma-receptor genes polymorphisms with chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis. J Cell Biochem2019;120:12010–7.SuzukiA, HorieT, NumabeY. Investigation of molecular biomarker candidates for diagnosis and prognosis of chronic periodontitis by bioinformatics analysis of pooled microarray gene expression datasets in Gene expression omnibus (GEO). BMC Oral Health2019;19:52.ZhangX, WangZ, HuL, ShenX, LiuC. Identification of potential genetic biomarkers and target genes of peri-implantitis using bioinformatics tools. Biomed Res Int2021;2021:1759214.BuffoliB, DalessandriM, FaveroG, MensiM, DalessandriD, Di RosarioF, et al. AQP1 expression in human gingiva and its correlation with periodontal and peri-implant tissue alterations. Acta Histochem2014;116:898–904.ChenD, LiZ, LiZ, SunY, LiuQ, YangJ, et al. Transcriptome analysis of human peri-implant soft tissue and periodontal gingiva:A paired design study. Clin Oral Investig2023;27:3937–48.CaiY, ZuoX, ZuoY, WuS, PangW, MaK, et al. Transcriptomic analysis reveals shared gene signatures and molecular mechanisms between obesity and periodontitis. Front Immunol2023;14:1101854.