This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Stafne bone cavities (SBCs) are uncommon well-demarcated defects of the mandible, which often occur in the posterior portion of the jaw bone and are usually asymptomatic. Furthermore, SBC is found in men aged 50-70-year-old. Anterior mandibular variants of SBC are very rare. This article describes a case of anterior SBC in a 45-year-old man that resembled endodontic periapical lesions. Upon histopathological examination, it turned out to be a normal salivary gland tissue.
Stafne bone cavity (SBC) is a pseudocyst of the jaw bone, which has also been termed lingual mandible bone cavity, lingual mandible bone depression, static, latent, or idiopathic bone cyst, cavity, or defect.
In this article, we describe a case of unusual anterior lingual mandibular salivary gland defect in a 45-year-old man that mimicked a periapical lesion of endodontic origin.
A 45-year-old man referred to the Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences for routine dental and periodontal examinations. The patient′s medical history was not significant. He was not a smoker and revealed no history of trauma or jaw surgery. On extraoral examination, he had a normal appearance. On intraoral examination, the patient had neither any pain nor swelling on the buccal and lingual aspects of the mandible. The radiographic images showed a well-defined unilocular radiolucency below the apices of the left lateral incisor and left canine teeth
Furthermore, deep caries was observed in the left lateral incisor. The clinician suspected a periapical lesion of endodontic origin, but unfortunately, the vitality test of the tooth was not done. To rule out any possible existing pathology in anterior mandible, a diagnostic excision biopsy was planned. The surgical exploration revealed the lingual cortex had been destroyed. Further, the gross examination indicated a soft, relatively firm, brownish, gray mass with granular surface measuring approximately 20 mm × 10 mm × 20 mm. Moreover, histopathologic examination showed a normal salivary gland tissue, with many mucous acini and ducts, which was consistent with normal sublingual gland
(a) Periapical radiograph showing a well-defined radiolucency below the apex of the left lateral incisor and the left canine teeth. (b) Panoramic image showing the radiolucency in the anterior region of the mandible. (a) Photomicrograph of the removed tissue showing the normal salivary gland tissue (H and E, ×100). (b) Photomicrograph of the mucous acini and salivary gland ducts (H and E, ×400). (a) Photomicrograph of the mucous acini and inflammatory cells (H and E, ×400). (b) Photomicrograph of the fat tissue, nerve bundle, blood vessels, and muscles tissue (H and E, ×100).
For the first time, SBCs were described in 1942.
SBCs in the posterior part of the mandible usually have typical clinical and radiographic features that allow an easy diagnosis. Most of the lesions are asymptomatic and nonprogressive.
Most of the time, endodontic treatment is undertaken owing to this misinterpretation. Biopsy is usually undertaken following failure of endodontic treatment. Thus, to avoid unnecessary endodontic treatment for such lesions, vitality pulp test must be performed.
According to the reported cases of anterior SBC, wide range, from 18 to 64 years, with a mean of 43 years has been noted, which is similar to our case.
Radiographically, the bony cavities resulting from this lesion usually appear as a circumscribed, unilocular osteolytic radiolucency. The size of the lesions has ranged from 0.5 to 2 cm, with a median size of 1.2 cm.
The pathogenesis of SBC is not yet clearly known, but most studies accept the congenital malformation theory, which states that a portion of the salivary gland tissue gets congenitally entrapped during the mandible development.
According to most studies, the posterior and anterior variants of SBCs do not need further treatment. Surgical exploration, incisional biopsy, and enucleation are frequently done only for diagnostic reasons.
Generally, the management of SBC should be of a conservative approach with radiographic follow-up, and no treatment is necessary. However, surgical exploration and biopsy may be reserved for those cases simulating any other benign or malignant lesions with uncertainty in diagnoses.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial in this article.